Are you neither a historic Christian, or a LDS Christian? It seems that your view doesn't hold much water if you do not conisder yourself to be a Christian. Please consider the thread topic too when you answer.
Seems you cannot stop yourself from dismissing posts that interfere with your world view.
A fact is a fact, regardless of whether it is stated by a Christian or a non-Christian.
I agree.
Problem is that Fish-Hunter is not interested in facts unless he thinks they support his world view.
Why do you continue to avoid answering simple questions and simply try to change the subject every time you post?
I think it is because he has to avoid any point that he does not have a ready copy/paste reply for.
Define fact from opinion and you will see the light, maybe?
And here we see Fish-Hunter giving some pretty good advice.
Advice he himself refuses to follow...
Your questions have nothing to do with the validity and the trustworthiness of the Holy Bible.
I disagree.
But then, with your limited understanding of the validity and trustworthiness of the Bible, I have no doubts that you do not understand the relevance.
Do you know why the Bible is called the Holy Bible?
I do.
However I am most interested in why you think it is.
The LDS position in regards to the Holy Scripture is simply and opinion with an intent to create a new religion.
Funny thing is that that is EXACTLY what Calvinism is as well.
Bet you disagree though.
Go back to the opening thread. This is about LDS Beliefs and the Bible. Does your LDS views line-up with biblical truth.
Seems you are confusing your opinions as truth.
Though it does seem to me that your opinions are merely the paroting of some one elses opinions.
Which would actually make it rather more complex than I stated, but one needs start somewhere.
On the contrary, the Holy Bible reveals that God's Word stands forever! If you don't want to discuss the contents of the Scriptures, then you have already admitted defeat in your view to attack the validity of the entire Scriptures.
Then you admit to defeat.
For you have not once ever on this forum addressed the fact that your "Bible Only" view is not Biblical.
How does the LDS Belief stand up to the light of Scripture alone?
It NEVER did claim to be Bible alone.
That has been your strawman from get go.
Funny thing is, that here you complain and whine about LDS beliefs not standing up to Bible Alone when YOUR beliefs do not stand up to Bible Alone.
But then, you are quite the expert at ignoring the facts that you dislike.
Another question for you to ignore:
Why do you feel that the LDS must explain how their beliefs stand up to Bible Alone, when you refuse to even acknowledge that your beliefs do not stand up to Bible Alone?
I think FFH's infamous statement speaks for the Mormon Church.
I think your refusal to remove the forest from your own eye speaks much louder.