Yes.So the "natural" rule is sometimes broken?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes.So the "natural" rule is sometimes broken?
So if a person is born with 7 fingers on each hand due to Polydactyly, is it your view that this is perfectly normal, and no need for treatment? If so, why do you suppose the medical community has determined Polydactyly to be an deformity/syndrome?
Yes.
Ah, I understand now, thanks.
Almost every categorization scheme suffers from rare exceptions. That does not mean the scheme is wrong. The definition I provided is overwhelmingly correct, and I agree that exceptions exist.
You are unclear on the idea of biological sex? really?
I majored in molecular biology at uni. (admittedly that was a long time ago )
But this seems like a solid, workable definition:
Is it fair to say that "x is a man" and "x is a male" are identical statements for you two? Gender is just another word for biological sex?The Sex Chromosomes you are born with decide. If you have a "y" Chromosome, you are a man, if you have only "x" you are woman
Only if you conflate the word "man" with the word "male" and the word "woman" with the word "female".The Sex Chromosomes you are born with decide. If you have a "y" Chromosome, you are a man, if you have only "x" you are woman
Does this mean that those who are infertile are neither?In the truest sense Male and Female are based on reproductive capacity.
We've been discussing that question on other, current threads. IMO "gender" is poorly and inconsistently defined, but these days it's mostly NOT the same thing as biological sex.Gender is just another word for biological sex?
We've been discussing that question on other, current threads. IMO "gender" is poorly and inconsistently defined, but these days it's mostly NOT the same thing as biological sex.
Yerda addressed a question to me and I responded, what on earth is your problem?You know what IMO means, right?
Yerda addressed a question to me and I responded, what on earth is your problem?
It's not something I've ever been able to wrap my head around fully. I had never thought about gender identity at all until I watched a Louis Theroux documentary about trans kids a few years ago.We've been discussing that question on other, current threads. IMO "gender" is poorly and inconsistently defined, but these days it's mostly NOT the same thing as biological sex.
Real men just rip the hair from their faces with their bare hands.
It's not something I've ever been able to wrap my head around fully. I had never thought about gender identity at all until I watched a Louis Theroux documentary about trans kids a few years ago.
Real men just rip the hair from their faces with their bare hands.
What a time to be alive it isThat was primitive man, but modern man uses modern technology, made by men.
Yep. Kinda. I'm aware that others experience a different world than I.One step at a time.
Can you understand the concept of neurodiversity?
Yep. Kinda. I'm aware that others experience a different world than I.
That reminds me, my partner has aphantasia. That is much stranger than any gender identity to me.
The Sex Chromosomes you are born with decide. If you have a "y" Chromosome, you are a man, if you have only "x" you are woman