doppelganger
Through the Looking Glass
Actually, I prefer the term "involuntary recycling of biological material." Then I can do it with impunity.:thud:Yeah... that would be killing, not murder.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Actually, I prefer the term "involuntary recycling of biological material." Then I can do it with impunity.:thud:Yeah... that would be killing, not murder.
This may be a better question for the Disciples forum, but it's cogent here, too.
- My personal belief and one that many Disciples share is that the problem is not alcohol per se, but rather the abuse of it. When people spend grocery or rent/mortgage money on alcohol or start withdrawing from family and friends because they'd rather get drunk, then they have a real serious problem.
- I believe so. Jesus turned water into wine AND admonished those who were who drunkards.
- Our church uses grape juice instead of wine and forbids alcohol in any church property. I've shared a beer with our pastor. We were at a Super Bowl party with friends from our church and from other sources. We had plenty of food, and nobody got drunk. Some people did not drink, and we respected their choice. I guess you could say it is partly based on social pressures in that if there is no alcohol in the church, no one will feel pressured to drink it.
- Yes. We have several recovering alcoholics in our congregation, and our church hosts AA meetings. The purpose of the Lord's Supper is to recognize Jesus' sacrifice that unites us as Christians. What matters is that we come to the table. The liquid we use to symbolize the blood is secondary. If some people are uncomfortable with wine, there is no harm in using a non-alcoholic drink. We also fill some communion cups with water at the request of some diabetic members. I'm very comfortable with that action as well. :162:
doppelgänger;851282 said:Actually, I prefer the term "involuntary recycling of biological material." Then I can do it with impunity.:thud:
These are, by definition, extreme.Anything?! Like murder, adultery, and lying?
The entire text isn't that all that long, Pete. I'm not sure how I could narrow it down. I have put in in paragraph form for you and removed all of the footnotes for easier reading, though:Katzpur or Becky,
Could you provide the precise reading on this for us? Becky gave us a link to the ENTIRE text, but I would like to see it narrowed down just a tad. Thanks in advance.
I'd echo this. The only thing I'd add is that a small amount of wine, in the Eucharist, is not just fine, but required, and, yes, this is totally consistent with Scripture (I won't say Scripturally based as that doesn't really work in our faith). And no, it certainly wasn't grape juice that was used at the Last Supper.
James
OK, there are SOOOO MANY reactions to alcohol within Christendom...
- What DO you believe?
- Is it scripturally based?
- Is it based on social pressures?
- Are you comfortable with how your congregation views alcohol???
First off, it's not the alcohol that is good for you, but the grapes themselves. You can get exactly the same health benefits from grape juice! Second, to the best of my knowledge, "alcohol" is never actually mentioned in the Bible. I'm not saying that Jesus didn't drink wine; what I am saying is that we don't know exactly what the alcohol content of that wine was.1. Light alcohol consumption (red wine) can actually be good for your health. And clearly, Christ didn't have an issue with alcohol as He Himself enjoyed it.
First off, it's not the alcohol that is good for you, but the grapes themselves. You can get exactly the same health benefits from grape juice!
Second, to the best of my knowledge, "alcohol" is never actually mentioned in the Bible. I'm not saying that Jesus didn't drink wine; what I am saying is that we don't know exactly what the alcohol content of that wine was.
I don't drink. I don't think that drinking alcohol is unbiblical although it does say to not get drunk. Still, being a Christian is also about standing out and conforming to what unbelievers would probably consider Christian behavior (Paul speaks about this). So, I guess it is sort of a personal conviction. I have many friends who are Christians and drink several times a week. I don't usually say anything to them unless they ask me why I'm not drinking.
I don't think you should have to feel guilty, Dawny. I was just pointing out that there are no specific "health benefits" to wine that can be attributed to the alcohol it contains.If I want grape juice...I'll drink grape juice.
If I want a glass of wine...I'll drink a glass of wine.
I'm not going to feel guilty for drinking either.
There are pros and cons to drinking BOTH.
No, it doesn't matter to me in the slightest. If my religion did not forbid it, I would definitely enjoy a glass of wine with my dinner now and then.Does it matter? Those who feel it's wrong to drink it...will not and those who drink alcohol will drink...
I don't think you should have to feel guilty, Dawny. I was just pointing out that there are no specific "health benefits" to wine that can be attributed to the alcohol it contains.
Actually Katz - there is one - it helps to keep the blood flowing and it also thins the blood so is apparantly very good for people with high BP. Personally I dont like alchohol so dont drink it anyway - I have got to the point now where if I do have the slightest I am sick, as my body isnt used to it.
I think it is a personal choice - I dont see problem with people have a glass a two a week. What I dont agree with is people who equate alcohol with being social. I have been told many times that I am unsociable because I dont drink. I dont need alcohol to enjoy myself and IMO people who need alchohol to enjoy themselves lead a very sad life.
I have been drunk and it was awful! I dont see how people find that fun or sociable!
You have the right to disagree with people drinking socially but drinking socially doesn't mean that one lives a very sad life.
There are some social situations in my life, where I'd be dissapointed not to find a bit of alcohol. Does this mean that I'm a sad person and lead a sad life?
If people give you a hard time because you choose not to drink in a social setting, they obvious have issues but I don't think they're sad because they enjoy alcoholic beverages while having fun.
Mind you, I DO have quite an issue with alcoholism. I don't have a problem with light to moderate drinking in a responsible manner.
I think you misread my post! I said "NEED alcohol to enjoy themselves. Meaning the only way they think they can be social is to drink. I am not on about people who enjoy themselves whether they are drinking or not and have a drink from time to time - even every night - I am on about people who say that to enjoy oneself, one MUST drink. That really annoys me - as I dont drink, I dont NEED drink and yet can still have the best time of my life!
Another thing I didnt say I disagreed with people drinking SOCIALLY - I said I dont like when all they do is drink and get flat out drunk - its neither fun for the person (unless you like the world feeling upside down) or people around them
No, I didn't misread your post at all.
There are certain social settings where I feel the need to drink to fully enjoy myself. I suppose I'm just one of the sad ones.