Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
Namaste,
Hehehe. Because you know me better than most here. Anyways, this is totally random, but I have a Nepali folk song you might enjoy. I have no idea what the lyrics are but the flute and the beat are very soothing. It is something you might like. Please check it out:
[youtube]pxckvkOhqFc[/youtube]
Super Hit New Nepali Teej Song 2069 {He Piyari}By Khuman Adhikari & Ramila Neupane - YouTube
Bhaginī-ji, that was my point exactly. I repeatedly stressed the fact in my previous posts that in those ancient days, it was allowed and it was an obvious occurrence because it was completely a different era. My concern was to address the falsity of certain Hindus that believe that no sanctified animal sacrifices ever occurred in the history of Hinduism.
'Tis, I, son of Lords Mitra and Varuna, who is! "For what harm can Ishtāśva, Ishtaraśmir, or any other prince do to I who enjoy the protection [of Shri Mitra-Varuna]?!" (R.V.1.122.13)
I agree, not completely, but agree, nonetheless.
Now, here is the thing, and bare with me, por favor. The Nambudiri's have been gifted secret purificatory rituals from the days of Lord Shri Parshuram. They have the knowledge on how to properly offer sanctified meat offerings through their conduction of the Yagams that they do. But, the reason that they didn't opt to offering a real, "living" sacrifice was because Indian "secularists" complained a whole lot.
These "secularists" are from the very corrupt Congress Party and have no problem when Muslims slaughter thousands upon thousands of goats during/after Eid, nor when both Christians and Muslims consume beef throughout India. In fact, these "secularists" encourage them and have even been responsible for picking up "stray" cows on roads and transporting them to slaughter houses.
But, as soon as they heard that Hindus were going to sacrifice two to three goats properly and ritualistically with all safe measurements involved, they went bonkers and filed FIRs and lodged complaints. Very hypocritical if you ask me. But, the Nambudiris didn't mind, and complied and opted instead for constructed representatives of goats to offer during the conclusion of their Yagams (Yagyas).
M.V.
how did I know you were going to say this
Hehehe. Because you know me better than most here. Anyways, this is totally random, but I have a Nepali folk song you might enjoy. I have no idea what the lyrics are but the flute and the beat are very soothing. It is something you might like. Please check it out:
[youtube]pxckvkOhqFc[/youtube]
Super Hit New Nepali Teej Song 2069 {He Piyari}By Khuman Adhikari & Ramila Neupane - YouTube
yes this is true , but it is also true that for one to make such sacrifices one must be very pure in ones devotion , the preists in previous yugas were much purer than is possible in kail yuga . at one time the horse sacrifice was deemed the higest sacrifice , but it is not recomended for this yuga due to the impurity of our minds .
it is also true , that an animal killed in the correct way by a pure being is imidiately liberated ,
Bhaginī-ji, that was my point exactly. I repeatedly stressed the fact in my previous posts that in those ancient days, it was allowed and it was an obvious occurrence because it was completely a different era. My concern was to address the falsity of certain Hindus that believe that no sanctified animal sacrifices ever occurred in the history of Hinduism.
but who in this age is that pure ?
'Tis, I, son of Lords Mitra and Varuna, who is! "For what harm can Ishtāśva, Ishtaraśmir, or any other prince do to I who enjoy the protection [of Shri Mitra-Varuna]?!" (R.V.1.122.13)
what you say also is very true , that in some parts animal sacrifices have still continued up to this day . .... but in most traditions this has not been continued for reasons given above . to sacrifice an animal one must have the putrity of mind to sacrifice directly to the supreme as a part of ones dharma and with no other attatchment (not even wishing for any result) , this is very difficult in this age .
I agree, not completely, but agree, nonetheless.
I liked very much what was shown in the video you posted earlier , the preist explained that they had decided not to sacrifice a living animal and made clay representations instead . :namaste
Now, here is the thing, and bare with me, por favor. The Nambudiri's have been gifted secret purificatory rituals from the days of Lord Shri Parshuram. They have the knowledge on how to properly offer sanctified meat offerings through their conduction of the Yagams that they do. But, the reason that they didn't opt to offering a real, "living" sacrifice was because Indian "secularists" complained a whole lot.
These "secularists" are from the very corrupt Congress Party and have no problem when Muslims slaughter thousands upon thousands of goats during/after Eid, nor when both Christians and Muslims consume beef throughout India. In fact, these "secularists" encourage them and have even been responsible for picking up "stray" cows on roads and transporting them to slaughter houses.
But, as soon as they heard that Hindus were going to sacrifice two to three goats properly and ritualistically with all safe measurements involved, they went bonkers and filed FIRs and lodged complaints. Very hypocritical if you ask me. But, the Nambudiris didn't mind, and complied and opted instead for constructed representatives of goats to offer during the conclusion of their Yagams (Yagyas).
M.V.
Last edited: