Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If you're christian, what makes the myth of the resurrection "true" while the myth of mohamed's night journey is not?
If you're muslim, why is it the other way around?
Any other mythology to which you might adhere?
I don't know what the night journey is. Someone want to fill me in? I know I could just google it but it's more fun to hear it from a person.
Wikipedia said:Islamic tradition relates that in 620, Muhammad experienced the Isra and Mi'raj, a miraculous journey said to have occurred with the angel Gabriel in one night. In the first part of the journey, the Isra, he is said to have travelled from Mecca to "the farthest mosque" (in Arabic: masjid al-aqsa), which Muslims usually identify with the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. In the second part, the Mi'raj, Muhammad is said to have toured heaven and hell, and spoken with earlier prophets, such as Abraham, Moses, and Jesus.
They should not be taken as factual, but instead metaphorical. There is a deeper meaning than just Jesus happening to rise from the dead after being crucified and the same goes for Muhammad.
MY mythology is the one true belief system simply because I have so much more faith than everyone else.If you're christian, what makes the myth of the resurrection "true" while the myth of mohamed's night journey is not?
If you're muslim, why is it the other way around?
Any other mythology to which you might adhere?
They should not be taken as factual, but instead metaphorical. There is a deeper meaning than just Jesus happening to rise from the dead after being crucified and the same goes for Muhammad.
Thanks.Here you go
Pretty much. The Abrahamic god has always "fallen apart" for me.If religion is metaphorical, then the entirety of Genesis is a metaphor, therefore Jehovah simply has no authority as a demiurge.
Since Adam and Eve are metaphorical, there was no original sin. As there was no original sin, there would be no "need" for the Christ figure to die for everyone's sins. As there was no resurrection, and no creation, all three Abrahamics fall apart immediately.
I was thinking it, but I wasn't going to say it.Someone: "But the teachings of Muhammad are incompatible with your own beliefs."
That's why I went ahead and said the obvious, so no one else would have too. lol. But really, I don't think we can trust the modern incarnation of religious figures that are thousands of years old. Too many people insert their own ideas over time. Look at how Christianity has changed over the two millennia it has been around.I was thinking it, but I wasn't going to say it.
If religion is metaphorical, then the entirety of Genesis is a metaphor, therefore Jehovah simply has no authority as a demiurge.
Since Adam and Eve are metaphorical, there was no original sin. As there was no original sin, there would be no "need" for the Christ figure to die for everyone's sins. As there was no resurrection, and no creation, all three Abrahamics fall apart immediately.
If you're christian, what makes the myth of the resurrection "true" while the myth of mohamed's night journey is not?
If you're muslim, why is it the other way around?
Any other mythology to which you might adhere?
They should not be taken as factual, but instead metaphorical. There is a deeper meaning than just Jesus happening to rise from the dead after being crucified and the same goes for Muhammad.
No, they don't.
They are not dependent on literal mythology at all.
Are you asking about objective truth? Or subjective truth?
The highly subjective religious truth.What other form of truth exists?