d.n.irvin
Active Member
Reading IS interpretation. You may argue that the interpretation you derive from the work is the correct one, but it is an interpretation. "Interpretation" is just the process of converting text to meaning.
My friend, the logic or reasoning or understanding that you employ in reference to the term or word "interpretation," is incorrect -as it relates to study of the Bible and Bible Prophecy. Although it is an interpretation it is not "personal"interpretation -1.The act or process of interpreting: elucidation; explication. 2.A result of interpreting.3.An explanation of something that is not immediately obvious.
The fact that you have derived a different meaning than most from the Bible does indicate that you have a "personal interpretation", since at first glance it is markedly different than more common ones.
If you want to claim that your personal interpretation is right, well, go for it, but if you don't provide evidence or a rational argument, it likely won't do you much good.It could mean that, -Or it could mean I have devoted more time to the study of Scripture -and less time exposing my self to the doctrines of "Men" - My point is this: Most Christian churches base their doctrines(teachings) on Bible texts. Sound Biblical doctrines are developed from an in-depth study of all Scriptures related to a certain topic -- examined within there recorded context
Yes, it does seem that somewhere in the early Christian Church (and therefore during the time when "Christian" and "Catholic" were virtually synonymous), the day of worship got changed from Saturday to Sunday. No, I don't think the Bible predicts that this would happen.Sound Biblical doctrines are developed from an in-depth study of all Scriptures related to a certain topic -- examined within there recorded context
And I think I should point out something: you needed to exercise interpretation to determine that "sheep in many folds" means "believers in many denominations". Without bringing knowledge and judgement to the text, there's no particular reason to think that the passage means what you think, and not just that God literally owns lots of livestock.[I'm not picking on you] But as an example the statement " I don't think the Bible predicts that would happen" is a direct "personal interpretation" of what the Bible says. The phrase indicates,, that - you have read the Bible or portions there of -and gathered some type of a meaning that is indeed personal to you. Now whether or not the meaning gathered was correct in relation to ALL Scripture is questionable
Since when is being your brother's keeper a rule of Christianity?Granted,
I also recall other rules of Christianity that involve refraining from judgement, and allowing your "brothers" to answer to God alone:Since Cain killed Abel, and made that reply to God. The first two sons of Adam were tested in their loyalty to God -through Worship. Abel was the First victim of "religious persecution" unto death. We need not forget that -Worship -and How we Worship God -has been significant since the Foundations of the world! God proves through Genesis to Revelation that we are indeed our brother's keepers.
Romans 14:4:"judge not lest ye be judged" right. Again that is your "personal interpretation"and application of what is being said. Anyone that is called by Jesus name -"Christians" are and can be "judged" by that name. Christians are "judged" by the teachings of Christ. The Bible says, To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in the Isaiah 8:20.
Actually the passage that follows the quote above is quite appropriate for this discussion, IMO.
Romans 14:5-6:
It doesn't seem so, frankly. You seem to be reading quite a bit into the text that doesn't seem to actually be there.Hear again is your personal interpretation gained from just a few texts. In gaining a true understanding of what Paul is saying -we need to first investigate his target audience -the newly formed Christian Community of Rome -which comprised "Christian" Roman Jews and the newly converted Roman Gentiles -who were still engaging in disputes over the "Laws of Moses" "nitpicking" Romans 14 is a chapter that could be summarized as a chapter of Self -Inventory -teaching how we can live with "fellow believers" as members of Christ's body.
BTW: Brother Penguin, I saw your post in "Is Bible Prophecy Reliable?" And let me be the first to commend you on your willingness to even discuss Bible Prophecy. Out of all the posts made in three different threads in an attempt to bring attention to Bible Prophecy -You Sir -have been the first to actually entertain a serious discussion of Bible Prophecy. I just wanted you to know that you were worthy - at least in my mind -of commendation.I accept your opinion, but as a TRUTH -it needs to be investigated