Remté
Active Member
Neither is asking why you can't have something when you don't know what it is.Establishing cause and effect on such a flawed and limited study as the human genome project is just not realistic.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Neither is asking why you can't have something when you don't know what it is.Establishing cause and effect on such a flawed and limited study as the human genome project is just not realistic.
Establishing cause and effect on such a flawed and limited study as the human genome project is just not realistic.
Why? Give a reason as to why.
Pretty much all forms of life are based on the same genetic coding.
I don't see how an all powerful god would be limited to our crude and ineffective language, unless that god was not all powerful.Well i dont think God exists. But if God would even want to relate to us, he would do it on our level with our understandings because there is enough good language in there to make it happen.
If God is good, he would certainly be able to relay some information to us with the words we use. Perhaps God would expound on the great virtues or something like that. I wouldnt think a God's message would have to be anything but simple and clear. If anything is good people are not beyond the capacity to know it. Thats why we are all responsible to what is good.
I dont think God would expect perfection from a human being. But to do Good, and know enough about existence, that language is there.
And it appears that the experts in the field do not take this seriously at all It has very few reads and very few citations. If a new idea is taken seriously it will get far more than 8 citations."A detailed analysis that the human genome (map here) displays a thorough precision-type orderliness in the mapping between DNA's nucleotides and amino acids. Simple arrangements of the code reveal an ensemble of arithmetical and ideographical patterns of symbolic language. ...This includes the use of decimal notation, logical transformations, and the use of the abstract symbol of zero."
"Accurate and systematic, these underlying patterns appear as a product of precision logic and nontrivial computing,"
This interpretation leads to the conclusion that the genetic code appears to be "invented outside the solar system already several billions years ago." This statement endorses the idea of panspermia.
Reference:
The “Wow! signal” of the terrestrial genetic code
Article in Icarus 224(1):228–242 · May 2013 DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.02.017
Vladimir Shcherbak Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Maxim Makukov The Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute
However, there are other possibilities too. The universe is built just for us in mind and exists inside a computer program ( The Matrix). ...some programmer somewhere wrote the genetic code for life in their model universe.
That represents as evidence for common ancestry.Pretty much all forms of life are based on the same genetic coding.
I would be impressed with a magic carpet ride. But I am going to need an area rug for my chair and cooler.What would be the most efficient means for the most powerful being to send a message to us Earthlings?
Mine too.My receiver is on the fritz.
Why does God need books (or other written text) to spread his word? Seems like an incredibly inefficient means for an all powerful being. Surely an all wise and all powerful God could have come up with something better. I mean such things as sacred text and oral tradition, that is so crude and clumsy it seems more like something people would come up with.
That is the best answer I have seen. Books are a human construct to capture and disseminate information.God doesn't. We do.
Why not wi fi? A hot spot in our heads. That would be like telepathy, but the government could legally see what some of the stuff in your head is then. There would probably be a tax.How about this?
I don't see how an all powerful god would be limited to our crude and ineffective language, unless that god was not all powerful.
That represents as evidence for common ancestry.
This is certainly possible. Humanity may have arrived late as an intelligence in the universe. I do not see how this does not just push back who the ultimate designer is and end up with that designer being a supernatural cause that cannot be determined by science.There are places in base reality where life may have had billions of years to evolve beyond us Earthlings or post human futuristic intelligence could be several generations past us who are there ancestors.
I don't see how an all powerful god would be limited to our crude and ineffective language, unless that god was not all powerful.
It could be, but we only have the life on earth to make supported claims about. Until other cosmic denizens are found and their genomes are analyzed, that is all we can say with support.This could also be evidence for shared cosmic ancestry.
Why does God need books (or other written text) to spread his word? Seems like an incredibly inefficient means for an all powerful being. Surely an all wise and all powerful God could have come up with something better. I mean such things as sacred text and oral tradition, that is so crude and clumsy it seems more like something people would come up with.
Maybe it seems more like something people would come up with because God was reaching down to our level.Why does God need books (or other written text) to spread his word? Seems like an incredibly inefficient means for an all powerful being. Surely an all wise and all powerful God could have come up with something better. I mean such things as sacred text and oral tradition, that is so crude and clumsy it seems more like something people would come up with.