In the case of the baby being mauled by the dog, I am not sure if it was the same case I followed last year ... but it was quite depressing to me that more ppl were upset the dog was being put to death than they were upset that a baby girl had been viciously killed. PPL were too focused on defending the animal that they seemed oblivious to the fact that a defenseless child was killed and in a HORRIFIC way .. no one who had anything to say on it really mourned the loss of the child and only mourned the dog <---- *that* is what I don't understand. I am glad they put the dog down no matter the reason why he killed that baby girl. I would be lying to say otherwise. *that* is the kind of disconnect I was referring to.
Ironic the lack of human decency complained of by those who would prefer the well being of a dog over another human life. That IS what I admit to not understanding here. It is weird to be accused of placing myself up on a pedestal for saying these things whilst those who would value the life of a dog over that of another human's well being are praised. :sad:
As for those who are defending their animals to me, I am unsure why. I said that I myself have had dogs that were special to me. And indeed, it was nice that they obeyed my commands, offered me protection, and even gave me affection whenever I desired it. It is truth, that we can not (or at least we should not) manipulate humans in such ways ... thus, I am not arguing pets here. My appreciation for animals though does not take precedence over my respect for human life ...
In cases such as the above, if it means so much to someone that a dog who killed a child was put to death, then perhaps some of you might want to carry out more of a selfless love for the animals and advocate them being allowed to live more naturally on the planet rather than domesticated for our pleasure (<--- because that IS what pets are for .. our pleasure) ... ???? ... then, the situation would have been altogether avoided.