metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
I much prefer democracy.Theocracy is the only way oppressive rich won't dominate rest in terms of ideology and other terms. It's the only way.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I much prefer democracy.Theocracy is the only way oppressive rich won't dominate rest in terms of ideology and other terms. It's the only way.
I much prefer democracy.
"Democracy" is comprised of numerous different forms, and here in the States we have what's called "representative democracy".Democracy is an ambiguous term. In reality, it doesn't happen.
Nope - only the fringe - as I said.You do not believe current governments are entertwined with mainstream religious groups? Separation of church and state? Not really...
"Democracy" is comprised of numerous different forms, and here in the States we have what's called "representative democracy".
Where I live it does.Yeah but it doesn't happen.
Where I live it does.
No belief is so pure that it can’t become harmful by applying force on others and allowing greed and a lust for power to take over.When does an organized religion become dangerous?
I’ll use the Baha’i faith as an example for this thread.
Is the Baha’i faith dangerous? Should their political ideologies be opposed?
So, the Baha’is on this site are like some of the nicest people here, don’t get me wrong.
I was very interested in the Bahai faith at one point. They believe there should be a one world government which design is outlined in Baha’i scripture (at least from what I understand). This was a very attractive idea to me at first. However, looking back, I now see this as a possible danger to society.
Baha’is preach peace, sure, but what if Baha’u’llah is not a real prophet of God? Just some guy. There are only a few million Baha’is in the world right now, but imagine if there was a comparable number of them to let’s say, Christians (2 billion plus). We’d be in a lot of trouble I think.
One needs to only look at countries where religion has integrated itself with the political landscape. America has Christianity interwoven into their political system. Afghanistan is under Sharia (right?). Does mixing religion with politics ever result in anything good? No, they result in crusades and stuff like that.
I think this is when organized religion becomes dangerous. Supposing there is no prophet from god, then Mohammed and Baha’u’llah and other like figures are either delusional or con men. Either way, the influence that their religions wants to wield in politics is dangerous, not divinely directed.
I oppose the Baha’i world order, as well as any other religious order that seeks to exert its influence throughout the governments of the world.
Does that leave me opposing most religions?
What dangers of organized religion do you see?
Nah, I think your posts are an illusion, so why should I respond to them? Hmmmmmmmm?That's the illusion.
Nah, I think your posts are an illusion, so why should I respond to them? Hmmmmmmmm?