When Consensus Group Thinking is Useless

[tas8831]

Way to stick your head in the sand in denial of the objective fact that unvaccinated asymptotic people walk around carrying and spreading loads of viral particles.

It would be funny if it wasn't so dangerous.

You are clearly in extreme denial.



Not sure at this point if you are again exposing your ignorance, or in fact just plain lying.



Objective facts are objective facts.
You can label them "biased thinking" if you want, but you'll only be missing the fact that you're wrong.

In context of this pandemic, sadly, being wrong in that way has cost the lives of many.

"Natural thoughts"....

 

[Native]

SUB-OP: Playing versus Metaphysical Key Thinking.

Metaphysics is all about which is beneath or beyond all physical matters and it has a natural pattern recognition and intuition as it´s most genuine tools.

Motivation:
Science critic Mel Acheson explores some key questions: What patterns of evidence can be interpreted to fit other observations? How other observations could—or should—be re-selected and re-interpreted with different metaphysical keys? When new interpretations enable us to invent new processes, build new gadgets, and create new values—who gets credit for benefiting mankind?

Sixth episode in a seven-arc series on the art of critical thinking.

This episode handles old and newer scientific thinking in concordance with the technological and cosmological development and in a light of more coherent and interconnected theories of cosmos.

 

[gnostic]

Scientists are busy being scientists.

This is separate and apart from people commenting on science (and pushing pseudoscience) on social media.

When people assign motive and insert emotion into the scientific inquiry, that's something other than science at work.

That's Native's exact problem.

@Native have kept posting up YouTube video from Anton Petrov, whose only qualifications are in "teaching" for maths and biology, but Petrov's video subjects are on astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology.

Petrov have been making comments on these videos, but PETROV HAS NEVER WORKED IN ANY OF THE OBSERVATORIES, has no qualifications and experiences in deciphering observational results (evidence & data) of ESA (European Space Agency), NASA, and laboratories.

And yet, Native treats Anton Petrov as if he is some sorts of prophets or messiahs in all things "astronomical".

Petrov is nothing more than armchair critic. And Petrov isn't the only YouTube celebrity that Native worshippped. Example: Mel Acheson and his pseudoscience Electric Universe cosmology.

Why would I take anyone who have never worked in any optical or radio observatory?

 

[gnostic]

There are numerous ways to date various things that are very old and there are some assumptions involved that can confound our estimates. But that the earth is geologically and otherwise billions of years old is probably beyond dispute. At the very least the markers agree with this conclusion. C14 dating is useless before 55,000 years ago because of its short half life and loses a lot of accuracy at about 40,000 years ago.

There are substances on Earth, that is even older than the Solar System, including the Earth.

This substance - silicon carbide was found in carbonaceous chondrite type meteorite - the Murchison Meteor that crashed near small town of Murchison, Victoria, Australia, in 1969.

Silicon carbide don't exist naturally on Earth in large volumes, but the compounds have been synthesized and produced in large quantities by companies for decades, because they have many applications.

But silicon carbide do exist naturally in space, particularly in asteroids and meteors.

Anyway, the silicon carbide found in the Murchison Meteorite has been dated to 7 billion years old.

You certainly wouldn't use carbon-14 to date ancient meteorite. Uranium-238 isotope has half-life of 4.5 billion-year and Samarium-147 can measure up to 100 billion years.

U-238 is commonly used to date minerals like zircon, which are known to exist and form in the early Precambrian eon.