Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
Which works out quite nicely when it comes to initiating change according to my will.
Of course! As long as you recognize that there is no fundamental difference between "you" and "not-you."
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Which works out quite nicely when it comes to initiating change according to my will.
When I drive my car, the controls become a temporary extension of my will. I turn the wheel to turn the car, apply the brakes to slow down and stop, apply the gas to speed up, etc. (determinism via technology) However, the car is not me.Of course! As long as you recognize that there is no fundamental difference between "you" and "not-you."
When I drive my car, the controls become a temporary extension of my will. I turn the wheel to turn the car, apply the brakes to slow down and stop, apply the gas to speed up, etc. (determinism via technology) However, the car is not me.
Why have a mind, brain, and intellect at all then?So why do you decide to turn the wheel, apply the breaks, etc? What made you want to operate the car?
The car is not "you" from the perspective of you. But without the filters and discriminating order of your brain, it is as much you as everything else is.
It's a choice?Why have a mind, brain, and intellect at all then?
Is it? I suppose you can call thinking for yourself a choice, rather than allowing your mind to be overcome by something else.It's a choice?
I don't see it as a choice to have a mind, brain, and intellect, nor to execute choice. But I can see the car as an extension of "me." I can see the whole world as an extension of "me."Is it? I suppose you can call thinking for yourself a choice, rather than allowing your mind to be overcome by something else.
Why have a mind, brain, and intellect at all then?
To observe.
That's not to say that there isn't something to the feeling of free will. Because we are defined by our senses and how our brains model data, we experience ourselves moving as separate entities moving around and doing things. But simultaneously, we are not at all separate from our environment and we act from and through it. Our reality is an observation of this relationship.
What -- if it exists in the first place -- is the fundamental (i.e. ontological) nature of the will?
Is it....
(1) some physical thing?
(2) Or is it some metaphysical thing?If the will is free, then doesn't that mean the will must be metaphysical in nature?
And it the will is determined, does not that mean the will is most likely physical in nature?
Comments? Questions?
__________________
Here's a tune in a futile effort to make it up to you for posting on such a boring subject.