I am trying to get an understanding of what has been presented as three separate perceptions in disagreement. I only understand these three as a singular perception articulated in three different ways..
I am first an experiencalist. Whatever the ocean, clouds, nature, cosmos, does is totally independent of the intellect. No science no religion no human thought, no math, no words, nothing that prattles around in the tiny region of the brain self labeled "higher functioning" is causing it.
So please explain exactly what "belief" "non belief" " agnosticism" has to do with anything at all other than with itself.
Hiking out away in the wilderness from civilization makes all three absurdly urbane. Sorry all three, there actually is a larger than all three of you, that hides in the open, like a stick bug independent of all three of you.
Ps. The nicene creed is a disaster.. It placed all reality in the brain with two words "we believe" everything after that is thus rendered nonsense.
View attachment 25569
And isn't that the strange question. I mean, in this world as it is today, what does belief or lack of belief or no belief count for when capitalism seems to be the 'driving' force behind lives and well being? Isn't that the strange 'true' question?
So I guess the answer to 'why' belief or lack of belief or no belief could 'matter' in today's world is this:
Capitalism could provide for the individual 'body'; eating, drinking, paying for rent, for clothes, etc... and 'belief' could provide for acknowledgement of 'air', sun, moon, stars, natural wild life animals, rivers, oceans, etc...
It could assist in being able to know that we are living in Heaven's 'gift', 'creation', and so to this, we can 'appreciate', and maybe even give 'Thanks', to what They have done and what They are doing for Humanity/humans, etc... So, there is 'Life' out there. Otherwise, it could be nothing but a 'Black Abysmal' blah with nothing 'good' to appreciate.
And rather than thinking there are 'aliens' out there who lack in certain 'things', we can appreciate that there is Perfection out there that lacks in no thing, except, 'sin'.
When you hear of little girls who enjoy Princess stories and Knights in Shining Armor, I bet they are thinking of that 'Perfect' place out there where their 'Knight in Shining Armor', is 'Perfect'.
The 'cities' or Towns in those 'stories' probably do not have the 'dirty' things that life in this World has today.
And.. little 'girls' who enjoy such stories probably most likely might find sexual intercourse as a non appealing thing in their 'young, little girl' minds, even in today's time(s).
And so the question again... Why fill their minds up with things they do not enjoy having in them?
Why 'teach' sexual education at such young grades? Why not let their own mothers and fathers be the ones to do this??
Why not allow for their own parents to 'teach' about those 'non appealing' things to their 'Perfect' City/Town mind?