• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Was 'Jesus' ie; 'Yeshua', really a man of the East?

godnotgod

Thou art That
Yes, I put "Nazareth" in quotations above, using your stance as described above.

So, are you finished defending a 1st century Nazareth, where 'Jesus' lived without a peep for some 18 years? If so, maybe we can move on. If not, then please wrap up your argument or present additional evidence to support your view.
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
Where do you see a child who governed anything, other than one of the Pharaoh.

That a God interceded to create a virgin birth is just a religious belief. This thread is about the possibility of historical evidence for Yeshua having traveled Eastward during his 18 missing years.

The government "will be" on His shoulders.
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
So, are you finished defending a 1st century Nazareth, where 'Jesus' lived without a peep for some 18 years? If so, maybe we can move on. If not, then please wrap up your argument or present additional evidence to support your view.

We can move on if you'd like to continue.

Thanks.
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
So do you tentatively concede no 1st century Nazareth?

I am not conceding that in the place where modern Nazareth may be found, nearby the Mount of Precipice, nearby the Sea of Galilee, etc., etc. that Jesus lived until he was 12, possibly 33, and that Bible scholars call that place "Nazareth" in English.
 
Top