Yeah 1/3 sounds more reasonable (sarcasm)I mean, it sort of is a problem, but not one that needs to be solved via eliminating half the population. (Maybe just 1/3. /sarcasm)
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yeah 1/3 sounds more reasonable (sarcasm)I mean, it sort of is a problem, but not one that needs to be solved via eliminating half the population. (Maybe just 1/3. /sarcasm)
We don't have to realign ourselves for this. I am very far Left on a Political Spectrum. Revoltingest is equally far Right as I am Left. We tend to agree more often than we disagree, and we're both very deep South on the Libertarian part of the Spectrum. And we're also neither Dem or Rep.Not at all. It just means being open minded, and partnering with both parties.
Thought experiment.My goal is to eliminate the right.. And to eliminate the left... So that all we'll have are U.S. citizens with an array of opinions.
Perhaps I could twist your arm into joining me, as being bi-political.
It's the best way to be.
To be fair, his main goals is due to his fear of overpopulation and lacking resources. Which are environmentalist talking points.
They were also the talking points of early 19th century economists, late 19th century foreign policy experts, early 20th century right-wing extremists, and mid 20th century science fiction authors, among many others.To be fair, his main goals is due to his fear of overpopulation and lacking resources. Which are environmentalist talking points.
The divide in the country is over party policy agenda.My goal is to eliminate the right.. And to eliminate the left... So that all we'll have are U.S. citizens with an array of opinions.
I get the impression there's already something of a division within the Dems as well as the Republicans?Not at all. It just means being open minded, and partnering with both parties.
I think it would fit you perfectly. But that's just my opinion.
Voting against your own interests is a popular pastime amongst so-called low information voters.The divide in the country is over party policy agenda.
Republicans support Corporate/Capitalist policy
Democrats support Middle class/American worker policy
Which begs the question, why would someone in the middle or lower classes support Capitalist/Corporate policies over Middle class/American worker policies?
Could it be that poor people voting corporate aren't aware of Republican policies?