You make a lot of claims but never supply any facts to support them.
Correct, there is only truth and what some ignotant religious nut makes up to sell books to other ignorance people who think they are being educated.
Sorry - I need to clean this up -
"Correct, there is only truth and what some [ignorant] religious nut makes up to sell books to other [ignorant] people who think they are being educated."
Considering that you admitted that you have yet to read the book - and I'm certain you don't know much about Matt Walsh because he rarely uses religion-based arguments - who is the ignorant one here?
Then you didn't notice my first sentence
"He's trying to teach children his version of "truth"
Fair enough.
I noticed - which is why I clarified that "truth" is not subjective.
Either Matt Walsh is teaching
the truth or not the truth.
Many children's book authors teach lessons in their stories.
I take my kids to the library all the time and I see books trying to teach kids about climate change and LGBT ideology and all kinds of other BS.
He does do that, outright lies based on money grabbing ignorance.
You have yet to provide any evidence supporting the claim that anything Matt Walsh wrote in his book is wrong - or that he is ignorant of anything.
What you have described is what big pharma and Planned Parenthood are doing - outright lies to parents in order to convince them that their children can only be happy if they take medications and hormones for the rest of their lives.
It is a very evil money grab.
It is also child abuse to ignore the emotions of a child.
I agree - but refusing to experiment on your child is not the same as ignoring their emotions.
As a parent - and adult - we need to realize that children don't know anything, and that they need to be taught how the world works - based in reality.
If my child were to tell me that he was actually a girl - I would start by asking him what he meant by that.
More than likely he is just going to say that he prefers to play with girls, or he likes the color pink or some other benign thing.
But even he it claims that he is a literal girl - I would tell him that I love him no matter what - but that he is not a girl - he is a boy.
Then I would try to determine which adult put that idea into his head - because children don't naturally believe things like that.
Telling children their parents are brainwashed is good at keeping family values how precisely?
You make it sound like Matt Walsh is forcing his book into the hands of children behind their parent's backs.
Matt Walsh is not like a public-school teacher - indoctrinating their students about CRT and gender theory without their parents' consent.
A child will only see and read Matt's book if their parent buys and reads it to them - meaning - generally speaking - only those who agree with Matt are buying and reading this book.
And even if some woke parent were to accidentally buy Matt's book - it would be good for the little boy whose mom keeps putting him in a dress and calling him by a girl name to know that his mom is bonkers and that he is not a girl.
It would be no different than an abused child learning from a book that it is not normal for a parent to throw beer bottles at their children and burn them with cigarettes.
Around 94% of children who experience some kind of gender dysphoria grow out of it.
About 98% of children who are put on puberty blockers go on to receive cross-hormone treatments.
Starting a child on puberty blockers almost certainly guarantees that they will "transition" in some way.
Children who are confused about their biological sex should be taught the truth about biology and their bodies should be left alone.
They are way more likely to grow out of it if their bodies are left alone.
There is no need to force them into a category of people that is 19x more likely to kill themselves.
Read the definition (s) of truth.
No - since you are the one contesting what truth is - you should share your argument first.