Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hey ssainhu, I have no problem with your opinion. And personally I favor leaving this to the woman's will (forcing women give counter results ) but I believe it can be argued very well for a law that regulates the public dress according to the Islamic criteria.
Theoretically speaking, you are right and you are asking fair questions. But practically, I think it's not that simple for the identity of a given society with its constitution and ruling system (that were agreed upon by the people) to be altered and for voting for a different new identity. Not in France nor in Iran. Any political system goes to ensure its stability and presence. France went to ban the head scarves in schools or the niqab to protect its identity and prevent any possible threats coming from a potential different - opposing - ideological and political movement.At that time people voted for an Islamic Republic regime. Maybe they still want an Islamic Republic, or maybe they have changed their mind now and they want to vote for a non-religious government. Isn't it possible that they could have changed their mind?
Are they allowed to vote for a non-religious government? If yes, then that is democracy, if not, can we still say, it is democracy?
I expected someone to say this. I didn't say that the Iranian system fully represents democracy. And the theocratic element in it easily allow for tyranny and oppression.Iran's constitution may have been passed by popular vote, but Iran is not a democracy.
Regardless, I think we have to acknowledge that the status of women in Iran is way better than their status in many other Muslim countries where the governments don't enforce an Islamic dress code. The situation is not that dark like what some Western media try to portray.
I expected someone to say this. I didn't say that the Iranian system fully represents democracy. And the theocratic element in it easily allow for tyranny and oppression.
However, it can't be denied that the Iranians drew a certain line to follow for their country and it's not simple to go back to the start point repeating the same question about the identity and character of your nation especially if there is a fair degree of stability like I said in the previous post.
Anyway, the Welayit al-Faqih system is an extreme form of the mix between religion and politics.