I'll only slap someone that slaps me first. After initially coming here for a chat with others that have not totally worked it it out, i find many that are prepared to be condescending to those that know less than they. I saw no criterion for one to be 132 club member or portray some intellectual advantage over others.
Hmm...that sounds like a Satanic statement.
Hey...one thing granted I came to forum very uneducated in relaton to recent data. And hey... that's what I was doing here. What about you?? But the rudeness and lack of ability to provide information repectfully to the less educated makes this not the forum to learn. So I went and looked at what's out there as best as I could understand.
I am glad. This is an educational forum after all.
So some of what I learned was this. Scientists believe that evolution is a fact because humans have very similar genetics to primates and we were not created so we had to come from somewhere. I read of scientific debates around Neanderthal being no more different to us than we are to each other. Which makes sense seeing as humans were already here and bred with neanderthal to make humans. How's that for logic. Others assert we are closer to apes than neanderthal. Others say neanderthal were human others say not. Older research purports we came from Africa other research that maintains we did not. Research that suggests chomosome 2 was present in neanderthal. Two versions of how we got chromosome 2 both requiring a successful mutation of a gene that does not appear to have any advantage..yet proliferated, junk DNA MAYBE not so junky....and so the saga goes on. This info was not gleaned from creationist sites.. SOME evolutionists are too narrow minded to even admit there is debate around.. so I ask you who is uninformed.. as this is the idea I had initially anyway. It really appears to be a case of whose version you wish to accept given most of us are not scientifically educated to a degree as to debate research findings.
I see. But people only chose to debate it, when they are not satisfied with what is. Maybe you misinterpreted the part of Theory of Evolution.
Just like there is thousands of different species of birds, they are still called birds, same with beetles, monkeys, and other species of animals.
You don't see scientists debating how those other species of birds or animals came to be, they just accept it.
Being humans, we have instinct and natural carnal nature. Which makes us animals.
Instinct brought us here.
Pretty much all that appears to be agreed on by scientists is that we were not created and the most likely scenario is we evolved from primates because they have the most similar genes. How, when, where and why is still being heatedly debated in the scientific community. So this is what calling evolution a 'fact' is all about. Are you serious? Or perhaps not so open minded as you would like to think you are!
How, when, and where were humans created by the hand of God?
Maybe your missing out on the fact that the entire solar system was made from a nebula or a star that went supernovae. Essentially, all life is made from stars.
And it is a fact, that humans and other animals in general, adapt and evolve to their environment around them.
It seems after looking deeper and trying to educate myself I still see no reason to call or insinuate anything a creationist has to say is stupid or not based on evidence. If anything I feel you have less to sprooke about than before I had a read.
