The Supreme Court will decide if Donald Trump can be kept off 2024 presidential ballots

[Subduction Zone]

LOL!
Hardly a contradiction since I copy/pasted it from the previous post.
Thanks for the laugh though!

You contradicted yourself in your own post. When someone points out an error that you made and you did not understand it you should ask how you made an error.

Please note how often you fail when people ask you how they supposedly made an error.

 

[Pogo]

Those are the ones in need of psychological help.

Except the psychologists don't agree with you that there is a delusion, rather you are the one who comes off as in denial of reality.

 

[metis]

The problem was that bill did not close the border, and there was no guarantee to prevent Biden from reneging on the spirit of the bill and using the allotted money in the wrong way.

What about the simple fact that the Pubs backed the bill, especially since they wrote most of it, until the "Orange Messiah" came out against it? What you propose violates both our laws dealing with asylum but also international law, but then do you really care about either?

The rest of your post is nothing more than MAGA claptrap.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Interesting talking point.

Fact.

 

[SkepticThinker]

And whatever else liberals could get away with charging him for, correct? Fancy Wills certainly thought so, and is having to face the music for it.

Not liberals. Four separate grand juries composed of American citizens decided to indict Trump based on the evidence against him.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Why not? The Bill is self-explanatory. Articles telling us that the bill supposedly solves the border problem doesn't prove anything.
If you believe the bill to be what you claim it is, post it.

I just told you why not. Twice. Try addressing that.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Yeah, when will we ever see those so-called "facts"?

When the trials start, of course.
We've seen a ton of those facts already.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Still awaiting your evidence.....

Read the indictments, for starters.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Sex is male and female, and is biological fact. "Gender" is the crap liars are using to distract people from biological fact.

Wrong. You should take some courses in gender studies for a better understanding of gender as a social construct. This isn't new stuff.

 

[SkepticThinker]

It's up to the psychologist to decide. If a person has deceptive fantasies about their body and manifesting false statements, they will be handed over to the authorities that can help them with their delusions. There are facilities for that very purpose in existence already.

Handed over to the authorities? It sounds like your view of psychiatry is about 100 years out of date.

 

[Subduction Zone]

When the trials start, of course.
We've seen a ton of those facts already.

Yes, like in his New York state civil fraud case that he lost. In fact he lost it in an epic fashion. Both sides asked for a decision ahead of trial, something that can happen in a case like this. Trump's team may have done so in an attempt to limit publicity. The judge decided rather easily from the undisputed evidence, that is the evidence that both sides agreed was true, that Trump was guilty. The prosecutor was rather prescient. He could see what Trump would try to do so he presented his case as if there was no decision ahead of time so that all of the facts would be in the record when Trump inevitably appealed.

And how and why the amounts that he said that Trump owed were meticulously laid out in his decision. Funny that we do not hear anyone complaining about any of the specifics of that decision. The arguments that used to be made for Trump have miraculously disappeared.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I never said it would be up to me. It's up to the psychologist to decide. If a person has deceptive fantasies about their body and manifesting false statements, they will be handed over to the authorities that can help them with their delusions. There are facilities for that very purpose in existence already.

Do you not know how you contradicted yourself in this post? I could explain it to you. Others can see it.

 

[Laniakea]

You contradicted yourself in your own post. When someone points out an error that you made and you did not understand it you should ask how you made an error.

Please note how often you fail when people ask you how they supposedly made an error.

You need to stop focusing so much on me. This thread is about everyone's favorite subject--Trump.

 

[Laniakea]

Handed over to the authorities? It sounds like your view of psychiatry is about 100 years out of date.

People can still be adjudicated as mentally ill by a court using the testimony of psychologists.
Boys who think they're girls would fit the description since they are out of step with reality.

 

[fantome profane]

People can still be adjudicated as mentally ill by a court using the testimony of psychologists.
Boys who think they're girls would fit the description since they are out of step with reality.

Has a court ever adjudicated that? Was it recently?

 

[Pogo]

People can still be adjudicated as mentally ill by a court using the testimony of psychologists.
Boys who think they're girls would fit the description since they are out of step with reality.

And what would be the DSM 5 criteria under which they would be diagnosed.
Your distaste is no where near enough to have someone institutionalized as being a danger to you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Has a court ever adjudicated that? Was it recently?

Courts have this unreasonable tendency to bring in experts in the field so that they do not make decisions based upon personal prejudice. How ridiculous is that?

 

[SkepticThinker]

People can still be adjudicated as mentally ill by a court using the testimony of psychologists.

That's not typical these days and hasn't been for a long time. And it's definitely not typical for trans people.

It's not the 1920s anymore. We don't just lock up everyone who has any kind of mental illness. Good grief.

Boys who think they're girls would fit the description since they are out of step with reality.

Nope.

 

[Laniakea]

Has a court ever adjudicated that? Was it recently?

They used to until it became "politically incorrect", and psychological defects got reimagined, promoted--and then celebrated.

 

[fantome profane]

They used to until it became "politically incorrect",

And when did that happen? Was it in the 1600's?