Sheldon
Veteran Member
What i think is often overlooked in these discussions is that even if we had signed and thumb printed testimonies of those who knew Jesus that he rose from the dead all that would evidence is that they were most probably liars owing to the non-repeatable nature of the resurrection experiment.
For Jesus to prove that He could resurrect people He would have to prove it to each generation by actually doing it for each generation and allowing us all to personally be witnesses.
In my opinion.
I agree, the extraordinary nature of the claim, that defies natural and scientific laws, would need a lot more than subjective unevidenced claims from people to have witnessed something extraordinary they couldn't explain, even from an otherwise reliable and confirmed source.
I have point ted this out in previous discussions of the resurrection. The response is usually accusations of bias, as if people accept these kind of claims all the time, when the opposite is true.
Last edited: