Correct in a way, but I'm not sure what you mean by a highly censored library, you mean its true meaning is hidden? Frankly, it's not a perfect book, it has been rewritten many times, but keep in mind that Islam relies on the Bible.
No, I mean it in the very literal sense, that the Bible is quite literally a censored library of books. What I mean is that each book of the Bible was written separately, and compiled later by various people, leaving many, many books out because of on-the-surface "contradictions."
...So overall yes, the Bible has been translated into different languages, but the bottom line is the base of the Bible is 3 languages, Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, all the manuscripts agree with that, in other words arguing about King James is truly a worthless argument because it's not the original language of the Bible.
I know that, but tell that to the groups of people who believe the KJV to be the true version. (there are actually people who believe that) The reason I used it as an example is because English is my native language, and I can't speak or read Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek, so I need a translation. I used the KJV as an example of when translations of texts lose their meanings over time because of evolving languages.
...but claims that the Bible is corrupted...
Where does the Qur'an ever mention the Bible? It only mentions (so far as I've read it) the Law, and the Gospel, both of which were sent by God. (It says) So if it were to say that the Bible is corrupted, then it would be a contradiction.
Ahh but you it is very important to know how it reads too, if I make a small mistake in writing, and that mistake is a legit mistake, it could give the verse a very different meaning, if there's a Quran manuscript out there somewhere written in the original system, people need to be able to read it to confirm for themselves that the modern day Quran is indeed the same Quran, and unchanged or unmodified, other than that, a person cannot make this claim, and Islam certainly cannot make this claim, because history proves that it has been rewritten.
And as I said, in order for people to continue to understand its original meaning, it has to be rewritten to keep up with the evolving language. If it were to stay in the same language the whole time, even if people could read it, it would likely make no sense, and/or people would get lost in translation because of the change in the meanings of words.
Last edited: