• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Metaformal System: Completing the Theory of Language

Ostronomos

Well-Known Member
(…)

From a technical standpoint, one of the most important features of language is that its study is necessarily self-referential. That is, any attempt to define, describe, analyze, or construct language uses language itself to do so. Self-referentiality is a powerful and underexplored feature of language, one which has puzzled and fascinated mankind for centuries. But at the juncture where language meets cognition, it is also a source of logical and epistemological complications. Due in part to these complications, language has met with many apparent failures, ranging from piles of self-contradictory and seemingly unproductive philosophical verbiage to the undefinability and undecidability problems of formal language-systems. There are many who seem to bel


(…)

Where the deceptive dualistic isolation of language from universe obscures their true relationship and precludes certainty, conclusive identification is impossible. But as physical reality can in fact be clearly identified through direct observation and logical deduction, without which neither science nor human experience could exist, and as deductive logic is a formal language inherent in cognition, this assumed linguistic incapacity is unfounded and illusory. Hence, the third level of language theory herein proposed already has an irrefutable basis. Let us more closely examine these levels of linguistic theorization.

(…)

If we regard natural and formal languages as the first two levels of modern language theory, it is possible to identify a third. Whereas the first two levels are dualistic, taking languages in isolation from their universes, the third is monic and self-dual, structurally fusing language and universe into a single coherent identity on the highest possible level of discourse. Featuring an intrinsic definition of language which is analogous to intrinsic geometry in its self-containment and external independence, it consists entirely of identities, or coherent self-dual language-universe couplings, and the operators and operations which generate and act on them.

https://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.p...e/740/1214

Recall that this is strikingly similar to my thread in the Philosophy section on sciforums called "Reality is Reduced to Axioms". I believe Langan based his idea for this paper on that.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
(…)

From a technical standpoint, one of the most important features of language is that its study is necessarily self-referential. That is, any attempt to define, describe, analyze, or construct language uses language itself to do so. Self-referentiality is a powerful and underexplored feature of language, one which has puzzled and fascinated mankind for centuries. But at the juncture where language meets cognition, it is also a source of logical and epistemological complications. Due in part to these complications, language has met with many apparent failures, ranging from piles of self-contradictory and seemingly unproductive philosophical verbiage to the undefinability and undecidability problems of formal language-systems. There are many who seem to bel


(…)

Where the deceptive dualistic isolation of language from universe obscures their true relationship and precludes certainty, conclusive identification is impossible. But as physical reality can in fact be clearly identified through direct observation and logical deduction, without which neither science nor human experience could exist, and as deductive logic is a formal language inherent in cognition, this assumed linguistic incapacity is unfounded and illusory. Hence, the third level of language theory herein proposed already has an irrefutable basis. Let us more closely examine these levels of linguistic theorization.

(…)

If we regard natural and formal languages as the first two levels of modern language theory, it is possible to identify a third. Whereas the first two levels are dualistic, taking languages in isolation from their universes, the third is monic and self-dual, structurally fusing language and universe into a single coherent identity on the highest possible level of discourse. Featuring an intrinsic definition of language which is analogous to intrinsic geometry in its self-containment and external independence, it consists entirely of identities, or coherent self-dual language-universe couplings, and the operators and operations which generate and act on them.

https://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.p...e/740/1214

Recall that this is strikingly similar to my thread in the Philosophy section on sciforums called "Reality is Reduced to Axioms". I believe Langan based his idea for this paper on that.

Yeah, you properly don't like cognitive relativism.
Relativism (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
 

Ostronomos

Well-Known Member
Thanks for the offer. Further reading:

The Metaformal System is an “extended formal system” which is perfectly self-contained, i.e., which has all of the properties and carries all of the ingredients required for its existence and functionality, including those just mentioned (read, write, reference, interpretation, production, processing, display, communication, potentiation, determination, and so on). In short, all of these functions are executed by objects of M (syntactors, telors) using the grammar of M.
 
Top