• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Looming Problem Of The Unemployable

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
This article....
Report: Robots Will Take Over More Jobs Than They Create « CBS Charlotte
...reminded me of the thought that we're embarking on a different age, one in which new
technology removes jobs instead of creating them. Unlike the erroneous Luddite predictions,
computer technology is different.
How do we deal with people who lack the intellectual prowess to do jobs which robots cannot?
Do we create make-work-programs for them?
Do we just let the social safety net support them?
Or is my premise faulty?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Any thoughts on how to best deal with a permanently unemployed class?
I'm still pondering it meself.
Some thoughts:
- Working to support oneself is good for people.
- Meaningless make-work projects are undesirable.
- The Amish address the problem effectively.
 
Last edited:

Phil25

Active Member
Any thoughts on how to best deal with a permanently unemployed class?
I'm still pondering it meself.
Some thoughts:
- Working to support oneself is good for people.
- Meaningless make-work projects are undesirable.
- The Amish address the problem effectively.

It depends on how much percentage of the population will become unemployed.
But what do you will happen to Capitalism if Robots take over Jobs?
Could we make them our slaves?(Well they already are, but still...)
Will there be Robot Rights Campaign?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It depends on how much percentage of the population will become unemployed.
But what do you will happen to Capitalism if Robots take over Jobs?
I wonder what happens when they become smarter, better educated & more socially acceptable than I am.
I calculate that this will happen in 27 years.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
It depends on how much percentage of the population will become unemployed.
But what do you will happen to Capitalism if Robots take over Jobs?
Could we make them our slaves?(Well they already are, but still...)
Will there be Robot Rights Campaign?
Yes I will fight for robot rights.
Sorry for the Dir incursion. But yes people will fight for robot rights. At least ai robot rights.
 

Aquitaine

Well-Known Member
This article....
Report: Robots Will Take Over More Jobs Than They Create « CBS Charlotte
...reminded me of the thought that we're embarking on a different age, one in which new
technology removes jobs instead of creating them. Unlike the erroneous Luddite predictions,
computer technology is different.
How do we deal with people who lack the intellectual prowess to do jobs which robots cannot?
Do we create make-work-programs for them?
Do we just let the social safety net support them?
Or is my premise faulty?
I would be very interested to see how this aligns with your Libertarian stance - after all aren't you for the abolishion of "The Welfare State"?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I would be very interested to see how this aligns with your Libertarian stance - after all aren't you for the abolishion of "The Welfare State"?
It's tricky. I'm still a ponder'n it.
"Libertarianism" is my agenda, but I see that extreme interpretations would be impossible to implement. The question then becomes how to maximize it in a viable economic & political system. I'm comfortable just trying to influence the system in a libertarian direction to the extent possible.
 

Aquitaine

Well-Known Member
It's tricky. I'm still a ponder'n it.
"Libertarianism" is my agenda, but I see that extreme interpretations would be impossible to implement. The question then becomes how to maximize it in a viable economic & political system. I'm comfortable just trying to influence the system in a libertarian direction to the extent possible.
This reminds me of when Reverend Rick said that "The Welfare State" would probably be needed in a similar thread ages ago. It's interesting to see Libertarians talk like this - I guess that's just down to the unique issues we'll face in the coming decades.

Still, very interesting to see you ponder what are almost conflicting views - but hey I guess it's a case of "Needs must".
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
This reminds me of when Reverend Rick said that "The Welfare State" would probably be needed in a similar thread ages ago. It's interesting to see Libertarians talk like this - I guess that's just down to the unique issues we'll face in the coming decades.
Still, very interesting to see you ponder what are almost conflicting views - but hey I guess it's a case of "Needs must".
I don't represent any other libertarians.
Tis not that the welfare state is moral....just inevitable.
So...what is the most libertarian way to have a welfare state?
This is how I view public policy.
 

Aquitaine

Well-Known Member
I don't represent any other libertarians.
Tis not that the welfare state is moral....just inevitable.
So...what is the most libertarian way to have a welfare state?
This is how I view public policy.
Wouldn't the most Libertarian way to have a welfare state be..... no welfare state?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
What would you say is the most Libertarian yet politically possible Welfare system?
That would be hard to say, since it would depend upon what compromise is available.
But I The Cato Institute made a revenue neutral proposal some years ago which I liked....
- Income tax is reduced to a flat rate of 17%.
- Every citizen gets $10,000/year
The above system eliminates many social programs.
Everyone, including the poor, purchase/rent their own housing, food, etc.
Thus, everyone is provided for, but the bureaucracy is minimal.
 

Aquitaine

Well-Known Member
That would be hard to say, since it would depend upon what compromise is available.
But I The Cato Institute made a revenue neutral proposal some years ago which I liked....
- Income tax is reduced to a flat rate of 17%.
- Every citizen gets $10,000/year
The above system eliminates many social programs.
Everyone, including the poor, purchase/rent their own housing, food, etc.
Thus, everyone is provided for, but the bureaucracy is minimal.

So essentially the Basic Income model?
 
Top