Submitted purely for the enjoyment of true master-debators.
s2a Heretic and part-time (skinny) Santa impersonator Jan 15, 2007 #1 Submitted purely for the enjoyment of true master-debators.
ChrisP Veteran Member Jan 15, 2007 #3 It's a catch 22 more or less. Read it again with particular reference to the references "The following sentence" and "The preceeding sentence" Sorry dude, but I got tired of the Chicken and the egg back in high school
It's a catch 22 more or less. Read it again with particular reference to the references "The following sentence" and "The preceeding sentence" Sorry dude, but I got tired of the Chicken and the egg back in high school
Buttercup Veteran Member Jan 15, 2007 #4 It's not that I don't get the connundrum...it's that I don't get what we're supposed to debate.
Radio Frequency X World Leader Pretend Jan 15, 2007 #5 s2a said: Submitted purely for the enjoyment of true master-debators. Click to expand... There is nothing to debate. It is a logical contradiction. There is also no conclusion either. It's like saying, "This statement is false".
s2a said: Submitted purely for the enjoyment of true master-debators. Click to expand... There is nothing to debate. It is a logical contradiction. There is also no conclusion either. It's like saying, "This statement is false".
Feathers in Hair World's Tallest Hobbit Jan 15, 2007 #6 Perhaps which are we supposed to believe? Should we believe the first sentence because it was the first one presented to us... That sort of thing?
Perhaps which are we supposed to believe? Should we believe the first sentence because it was the first one presented to us... That sort of thing?
RevOxley_501 Well-Known Member Jan 15, 2007 #7 <master Debater 1st place Ga State Forensics 02 policy 3 year judge \/\/007
Buttercup Veteran Member Jan 15, 2007 #8 I'm thinking we're doing exactly what he had planned. The little sneak!