The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence is false.

[s2a]

Submitted purely for the enjoyment of true master-debators.

 

[Buttercup]

Ok, you win, Cal. I don't get it.

 

[ChrisP]

It's a catch 22 more or less.

Read it again with particular reference to the references "The following sentence" and "The preceeding sentence"

Sorry dude, but I got tired of the Chicken and the egg back in high school

 

[Buttercup]

It's not that I don't get the connundrum...it's that I don't get what we're supposed to debate.

 

[Radio Frequency X]

Submitted purely for the enjoyment of true master-debators.

There is nothing to debate. It is a logical contradiction. There is also no conclusion either. It's like saying, "This statement is false".

 

[Feathers in Hair]

Perhaps which are we supposed to believe? Should we believe the first sentence because it was the first one presented to us... That sort of thing?

 

[RevOxley_501]

<master Debater

1st place Ga State Forensics 02 policy

3 year judge

\/\/007

 

[Buttercup]

I'm thinking we're doing exactly what he had planned. The little sneak!