We've all been lied to about the Hebrew language, as the people stating it literally can be shown to not understand it properly.
- אל - El (H410) is applicable to the Source, and is singular for God.
- אלהּ - Eloh (H433) is a Divine Being, the added H means manifest by the Source.
- אלהים - Elohim (H430) is plural of Eloh, and means Divine Beings or gods; beings manifested by the Source.
Plural of EL is אלים - Elim (Gods), not Elohim; where there is no additional Strongs reference number for Elim, even tho there are multiple cases of it existing in Hebrew (Job 41:25, Psalms 29:1, Psalms 89:7, Isaiah 57:5, Daniel 11:36).
In Isaiah 46:9 we're told that EL is not like the Elohim, and 'to remember the days of old', which references Deuteronomy 32:7-9, where
El Elyon is above the Elohim (Divine Council).
The Curse of Moses is because the Jews had rejected EL as the Source (Deuteronomy 32:18); whilst trying to make YHVH Elohim into EL, as they don't know the difference theologically.
Deuteronomy 32:18 Of the Rock who became your father, you are unmindful, and have forgotten God (EL) who gave you birth.
There is a Divine Council (Elohim) which surrounds the Source (EL), and outside of this reality, there are other realities possible with other Elim (Gods).
YHVH Elohim is the archangel who is Lord of Creation, and is a child of the Sources (Elim).
In my opinion.
The word אל literally means "towards" and is the same "towardsness" that sperm naturally has. It is loosely translated 'god'.
The word ים literally means "sea" and is any medium within which "towardness" אל can operate.
The letter הּ denotes the archetype of the womb whence anything is brought into existence
The word אלהּ literally means "these" and involves the "towardsness" and a womb through/of which to be born. It is loosely translated 'goddess'.
The word אלהים contains both:
אל - "towardness" / seed [bestowal] which is masculine
הים - "womb" / sea [reception] which is feminine.
When אלהים is the speaker, it self-addresses as 'let
us make Adam in
our imagine, after
our likeness...' because אלהים in itself is a royal plural: god and goddess conjunct as one entity. This is why when אלהים is not the speaker, it retains its singular quality "male and female created
he them...". Whenever a singular is used, the default "gender" is masculine. However, אלהים is not masculine or feminine, it is both: seed/womb bound by a shared will:
Shared will: And אלהים said:
To bestow: 'Let there be light,'
To receive: and there was light.
A secular understanding of אלהים therefor involves only two being(s) wherein one bestows, one receives, and the action(s) is (are) shared via a mutual will.
Now with all of this in mind, the Torah has 3-4 authors (therefor not from any potent god - entire exodus story is fabricated) therefor Judaism doesn't actually have a potent god at its basis, which is consequently catastrophic for Islam and Christianity as well.
This is why "belief" is not a virtue - it is actually the closest thing one can come to with regards to שָׂטָן 'satan' - when ones life becomes an expression of their bind(s) which exist in an ongoing state.
שָׂ - expression (three vavs = psychological/emotional/behavioral)
טָ - bind(s) (serpent)
ן - ongoing (same phenomena as light falling into a dense/heavy object)
When someone "believes" something (that is not true), this becomes their own bind. Any/all "belief"-based institutions are technically 'satanic' given that the books of Moses (Torah), Bible and Qur'an are all (at least) heavily redacted/edited and/or (at most) completely man-made, reflecting tribal (political) divisions.
We need to understand that, when these books were written, there *was no* separation of church and state in the M/E regions whence these books came. The state was the church - Islam being a good modern-day example of this (which is itself "belief"-based).
So those who call themselves "believers" are actually bound (by such "beliefs") which results in them trying to find *outside* sources of their own problem(s) (suffering) rather than realizing the problem is internal. When this blaming/scapegoating becomes a device for navigating life, the person descends into a state of projecting his/her own nature outwards while trying to condemn everyone else as having it. This is 'psychological projection' and is the same as the mark of Cain - one who digs from ones own soil rather than giving up the animal (nature) in exchange for human (evolution).
This is also where the Canaanite (Judaic-Islamic) notion of scapegoating and/or animal/human sacrifice comes from. The sins of the tribe are placed on another being, and that being is sacrificed which makes the tribe "BELIEVE" they are now clean. In reality, they are Canaanites doing Canaanite animal/human sacrifice. Any animal/human sacrifice involving real animals is itself of Canaanite origin. This has implications for Judaism/Islam.
All of these stories come from early Egyptian mysticism (Moses, who was actually an Egyptian Akhunatun, was trained in these mystery schools) and can be read/understood wholly outside of the religious institutions built around them. In fact such a secular reading could probably clean up a lot of the mess on the planet in my opinion - beginning with how a proper 'state' should be established based on how nature itself works: shared will between a male and a female (king and queen).
Unfortunately the Abrahamic religions hate women and reduce them into slaves to men. This is essentially what is destroying humanity - Islam being the culprit, Judaism being the parent culprit of having adopted idol worship from Canaanites. These things give rise to socialism / fascism naturally: don't criticize our book/idol! This is where antisemitism/Islamophobia come from: religiously-based forcible suppression of criticisms which undermine the religious 'state' and/or state of the "believer" (which are one and the same, usually revolving around a central idol/figure such as Jesus/Muhammad).