Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
I am not even sure there is a legal age limit to drink in the home in the Uk. It certainly is not obeyed if there is one. a similar question is asked on another forum, and most started drinking at a very young age.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
When the age for drinking is set at a ridiculously high level such as 21, it's no surprise that people are breaking the law. they should lowe rthe drinking age, and encourage responsible drinking.Lightkeeper said:What are you teaching your children by allowing underage drinking? You are teaching them to break the law. The earlier children drink the more chance they have to become an alcoholic. Alcohol is a drug and can't be good for a body that is still forming. Some parts of the brain isn't fully developed until a person is 25. If you truly want to teach them how to drink, then it can be done when it's legal.
There is an age for this. It's 5. You have to be at least 5 years old. I had an odd glass of wine aged 10 or so, on special occasions, and it was perfectly legal.I am not even sure there is a legal age limit to drink in the home in the Uk. It certainly is not obeyed if there is one. a similar question is asked on another forum, and most started drinking at a very young age.
Since "right" is subjective based on the previous posts (some agree with you and some don't) the parents are the only people who have the "right" to determine whether they choose to obey the law or not in regards to their children. These parents superseded the authority of the other teens' parents.Loki said:I think the mother here was excessively responsible, and it a brilliant example for other parents. If the law is rubbish, break it, and do what's right instead.
Cerwiden,Ceridwen018 said:The argument of, "Well, they're going to find a way to do it anyhow...we may as well let them." is pretty ridiculous, in my opinion. Arsonists are going to find ways to light people's houses on fire even though the practice is illegal--should we make arson legal because resistance is futile?
Kids most certainly will find a way to drink, even though its illegal, (I can attest that I certainly do), but for parents to condone such behavior can bring no good.
-They are teaching their kids that it is alright to break the law
-They are taking their child's responsibility upon themselves, (so much for 'teaching kids how to safely drink)
-Do the parents of the other kids attending these parties agree with this philosophy? Probably not the majority.
I can understand that by allowing kids to do some things takes away the 'adventure' of it, and therefore the kid is less likely to do it because the initial appeal has been taken away, but such thinking must be handled with great care, because it certainly doesn't work on everything. I have friends whos parents let them drink, and they milk it for all it's worth. Likewise, what about those kids whose parents don't know they're drinking? Such philosophy doesn't apply to all of them.
I dunno. I just think that there are some things parents should put their foot down on. Someday if I have kids, I won't be opposed to them perhaps having a glass of wine at dinner or on special occasions--kids should at least be exposed to and taught about alcohol--but I will never provide alcohol for them and their friends so that they can all get wasted, nor will I supply alcohol so that my kid can get wasted by himself.
Well, putting aside the fact that they are not yet legally adults, nor subject to any type of military requirements and that age has no bearing on whether or not they're tried as an adult. We recently had a 13 year old tried as an adult, so should we make legal drinking age 13 just because they can be tried as an adult?EnhancedSpirit said:These children are 17. This means in one year they are considered adults. They would be tried as an adult in a court of law, and the males will be required to submit their names to the military, and are free to risk their life to fight for their country. Why is it wrong to let them celebrate New Years in a responsible way?