Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
if you believe God is omnipresent, or Brahman is all pervading, then is the Lord with you?
if you believe God is omnipresent, or Brahman is all pervading, then is the Lord with you?
you don't get the holy spirit until you are baptized in the name; which is the name at exodus 3:14.In regards to God ( i assume the biblical one) the answer is NO. God and the holy spirit are the same thing and you dont get the holy spirit until baptism ( Acts 2:38). Simple belief is not enough. Also john 3:5
if you believe God is omnipresent, or Brahman is all pervading, then is the Lord with you?
I AM with you always, even unto the end of the age.
The Brahman is not distinguishable from the human perspective from the God or 'Source' from any other religion. Humans make distinctions based on their cultural perspective where no distinction can be made. Humans cannot define God.
Neither can the Holy Spirit be distinguish from the 'Source' some call God.
if you believe God is omnipresent, or Brahman is all pervading, then is the Lord with you?
I AM with you always, even unto the end of the age.
The Brahman is not distinguishable from the human perspective from the God or 'Source' from any other religion. Humans make distinctions based on their cultural perspective where no distinction can be made. Humans cannot define God.
Neither can the Holy Spirit be distinguish from the 'Source' some call God.
Brahman and I are the same.
because when you do, you separate self from god, you divide yourself from god.Why cant humans define God?
because when you do, you separate self from god, you divide yourself from god.
dualistic thinking
I dont undetstand. How do i seperate myself by defining God? I can define my body, that dont seperate me from my body.
Why cant humans define God?
Only if humans invented the 'Source' some call God(s).
There are too many contorted,conflicting and egocentric attempts burdened by human culture to define the 'Source' call God(s) for human efforts to define the undefinable.
The analogy of the blind men trying to define the elephant, or the flea to know the elephant.
oh but you can. it's called gender identity disorder.
when the mind doesn't align with the body, they are viewed as two disconnected things. you are disconnected from your god; when you see it as some otherness.
colossians 3:11
christ is all and in all, or exodus 3:14, it is what it is.
How does you know my definition of God is blind though?
if you believe God is omnipresent, or Brahman is all pervading, then is the Lord with you?
I AM with you always, even unto the end of the age.
oh but you can. it's called gender identity disorder.
when the mind doesn't align with the body, they are viewed as two disconnected things. you are disconnected from your god; when you see it as some otherness.
So does this mean i am God?
the way of bliss is walked by many who know it's center. the tao that can be delimited/defined is not the enduing tao.Other than just giving the personal answers to this, is there something you want to debate?
The story of the blind men and the elephant is a fable of ancient India concerning whether humans can know God. Look it up. Humans are essentially blind as to what the nature of God is.
The saying 'Can a flea know the elephant?' is an ancient saying with the same message.