Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Give me one unequivocal statement where Jesus Christ unambiguously states his own divinity.
Who says it's the "word of God?" I simply say it's the collection of texts determined to be authentic in their inspiration.No, it's just that the Bible simply isn't clear, thus not being the word of God.
No, it's just that the Bible simply isn't clear, thus not being the word of God.
Who says it's the "word of God?" I simply say it's the collection of texts determined to be authentic in their inspiration.
You need to get a grip on church history.By who? Some Church Fathers who came 300 years after Jesus(pbuh), disagreed with each other and destroying other text that opposed them.. Seems fair?
By who? Some Church Fathers who came 300 years after Jesus(pbuh), disagreed with each other and destroying other text that opposed them.. Seems fair?
Give me one unequivocal statement where Jesus Christ unambiguously states his own divinity.
Who says it's the "word of God?" I simply say it's the collection of texts determined to be authentic in their inspiration.
You need to get a grip on church history.
Well i was actually talking about the NT since the OT is not really that important according to many Christians nowadays.Not really. The majority of the Bible was accepted before Jesus came around. For the NT, the canon really hasn't closed. Sure, there is debate, but oh well. Doesn't take away from its importance.
Also, the Church fathers didn't come together and state which works were okay. The general population, who used these works, picked which books to use.
God's "words" come through people.You need to get a grip on God's words, not people's.
I didn't say they were authentic through inspiration. I said that they are the texts whose inspiration is determined to be authentic.Whose inspiration exactly? Texts can't be authentic thru inspiration.
What if I said that I can fly when no one's looking? Would that make my statement authentic? Would it be true if I wrote it in a book and claimed that it was authentic thru the inspiration of watching Superman? Would you believe me? It's the same logic as yours after all.
Well the Christian idea is that several unknown writes got inspired while in Islam we just have one who we know.I didn't say they were authentic through inspiration. I said that they are the texts whose inspiration is determined to be authentic.
(BTW: Aren't the claims made by the Quran the same ones you list here?)
Give me one unequivocal statement where Jesus Christ unambiguously states his own divinity.
Who says it's the "word of God?" I simply say it's the collection of texts determined to be authentic in their inspiration.
John 14:9
"If you have seen me you have seen the Father."
John 10:30
"I and the Father are one."
Too ambiguous?
That would be true for any Messenger/Prophet of God.
John 10:29 "My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all"
'My Father' obviously doesn't mean 'Me'(Jesus) since he is not his Father ... so Father is greater than All including me(Jesus).
So which one is it - Father is Greater than All ? or equal to I ?
So 'yes' absolutely ambiguous.
Peace.