• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Strong atheism and it's burden of proof.

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Not at all.

I do not see atheism as a default.
and to say it is not a belief ...is false.

'There is no God'......is a statement of belief.
It cannot be supported.

I say there is a God.....
Too many copies of intelligent life to say Nothing is behind all of this.
The details are too complex and persistent to say no Intelligent Design.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
Not at all.

I do not see atheism as a default.
and to say it is not a belief ...is false.
Well sorry, but it is not a belief. Theism is the belief atheism rejects.
'There is no God'......is a statement of belief.
It cannot be supported.
It does not need to be supported, there is no evidence to challenge it. That is why it remains the default.
I say there is a God.....
Too many copies of intelligent life to say Nothing is behind all of this.
The details are too complex and persistent to say no Intelligent Design.
So far ID proponents have yet to find one single example of an irreducibly complex structure. Not a single one.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Well sorry, but it is not a belief. Theism is the belief atheism rejects. It does not need to be supported, there is no evidence to challenge it. That is why it remains the default.So far ID proponents have yet to find one single example of an irreducibly complex structure. Not a single one.

Would you...do you.... ever say....?
There is no God.
 
Last edited:
Top