shmogie
Well-Known Member
LOL ! I don´t want anything, except that the proponents of abiogenesis be honest about their belief.That's what shmogie don't get.
Abiogenesis is a falsifiable hypothesis, not scientific theory. There are some evidences to support Abiogenesis, but there are still some unsolved puzzle with Abiogenesis, but there are researches are attempting to solve them.
The problem is that shmogie absurdly think that science must have all the answers, but science don't work that way. Often the answers they get are some answers to some pieces of the puzzle, which itself come from much larger puzzle.
When some unknown Neolithic person or people invented wheel, it doesn't mean they have invented a modern state-of-art automobile.
When the ancient Babylonian astronomers, and then ancient Greek astronomers began cataloguing some stars and constellations, do they need to invent space telescope, like the Hubble too?
Likewise, Isaac Newton discovered through observations - gravity - but he didn't know everything there was to know about gravity. Albert Einstein took the next step with gravity - General Relativity. And even Einstein don't have all the answers, he couldn't make it work with Quantum Mechanics.
It is called progress.
Abiogenesis may not have all the answer neatly stacked and in place, like shmogie want it, but progress, like all other science and technology, will take times.
But I really don't give a crap what shmogie want.
All this other stuff you posted means nothing as far as abiogenesis.
You are parroting the false argument that abiogenesis research is making vast strides, it is not. That is pure propaganda and fodder for the faithful.
You propose science progresses, and in time will understand the creation of life.
However, in a century it is further away than it was thought to be at the beginning of the century. As the complexity of life and itś operation is discovered to be more and more complex, abiogenesis becomes more and more difficult to grasp.
Right now there are about 9 hypotheses for abiogenesis. None have any really worthwhile evidence.
Just be honest about what you believe in.