What part was a lie? I've been accused of thinking That slavery is an OK thing. That opinion is a bold faced lie from the pit of Hades. I never said slavery was Godly. What I've tried to say is God took slavery and made laws governing a distasteful but common practice of the day.
And I'll say it again, having had good and bad bosses to work for, I praise God for every slaveholder of the past who was kind enough to treat his slaves as part of his family rather than the way Rome treated gladiators.
And I'll say again that harsh slaveholders had their own reward and will pay for what treatment they gave their slaves in the hereafter!
In general such wild overstatement as yours
in bold above are likely to be a case of
protesting too much.
All I had to go on was your own words-
I praise God for every slaveholder
Before you say I am taking it out of contest,
you provided the context; the ones who
were nice. You praise god for the nice ones.
For one unskilled in the art, it may be be
so obvious what they actually wrote.
You praised god for slaveholders.
Whether you qualified that with "the tall ones"
or, "the one ones who dont eat fried grasshoppers"
makes no difference. Your words still praise
god for slaveholders.
As for your falsehoods about me, you did
simply make things up to say against me.
That you would claim to be unable to see
where you did that is either disingenuous,
or, alarming.
lets take a look-
you didn't read it Audie, If you had you would have read the last sentence. But you didn't. I said "(The slaveholders who did NOT treat their slaves like family) had only their lives reward, no afterlife.
You, like Subduction Zone, don't believe in good people who lived in those times. I do. I don't think they were most of them, any more than today, but they existed. And they were not all slaves either. You two want me to live in the gutter with you and I refuse. I pay attention to the good examples in the Bible not the bad ones. Nor do I take history's worst examples of anything.
Of course I read it. I read it more carefully than you, because
you seem unaware of how the language works, and the meaning
of what you actually wrote. Yes, you qualified it, but that
does not annul the praise to god for slaveholders.
Falsehood number two is in bold, "you, like Subduction...".
You simply made that up, and it is absurd on the face of it.
Number three there is really over the top, again grossly insulting,
but withal too childish to take seriously enough to report you.
Do refrain though, unless you wish to continue presenting
the worst example of "christian" behaviour.
