• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Scholem's "Primal Flaw."

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
. . . The Bible delivers signs, symbols, and myths, that require interpretation. The foundational symbol of the Bible is brit milah, ritual circumcision.
That has NOTHING to do with the evolution of lifeforms that reproduce with two sexes. Stark, naked, utter NOTHING.

First lifeforms 3.7 billion years ago.

First critters reproducing with two sexes over 2 billion years ago.

Bible, written during the first millennium BCE.
Healthy minds know better than to be enlightened minds. The truth sucks really really bad for those who aren't part of the new testimony and the new covenant between the omnipotent one and his sons and daughters reborn without the use of the outer flesh of the mediator.
You need help.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
If a scientist owned rationality, science that never existed, would not be practiced.

As everything that does exist, exists and was formed by what he expressed in his reality as a Creator theme.....from all things came forth a being of presence.

Not a being of any other description.

For a human self does not own death in reality, it lives until it is no longer conscious.

Death is a scientific description as described by the studier.

And who gave you permission to study all creative presence to then impose upon it your male reasoning, who is the sexual owner, who then does comparisons to every other body without its permission.

If we subjected your living self as one self or a group of one selves who impose a form of self superiority, you would feel, react and behave the same way that any victim of your attempt to have it all removed back to the state nothing by observing oblivion in its reality and then subjecting your themes to releasing mass into that oblivion by converting bodies through the process of an activated spatial nothing point.

To you the Destroyer mind, you know that if you attack a body, no matter what body it is, the damage then causes an effect...how you came about understanding how to destroy another body by scientific purpose.

How a male discusses information has no spiritual purpose whatsoever, so who knows why any scientist inferred his reasoning to spirit, for you are not anywhere near expressing any form of spirituality in what you say.
 

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
If a scientist owned rationality, science that never existed, would not be practiced.

As everything that does exist, exists and was formed by what he expressed in his reality as a Creator theme.....from all things came forth a being of presence.

Not a being of any other description.

For a human self does not own death in reality, it lives until it is no longer conscious.

Death is a scientific description as described by the studier.

And who gave you permission to study all creative presence to then impose upon it your male reasoning, who is the sexual owner, who then does comparisons to every other body without its permission.

If we subjected your living self as one self or a group of one selves who impose a form of self superiority, you would feel, react and behave the same way that any victim of your attempt to have it all removed back to the state nothing by observing oblivion in its reality and then subjecting your themes to releasing mass into that oblivion by converting bodies through the process of an activated spatial nothing point.

To you the Destroyer mind, you know that if you attack a body, no matter what body it is, the damage then causes an effect...how you came about understanding how to destroy another body by scientific purpose.

How a male discusses information has no spiritual purpose whatsoever, so who knows why any scientist inferred his reasoning to spirit, for you are not anywhere near expressing any form of spirituality in what you say.

. . . Ok. So you do harder stuff too.



John
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
. . . The spirit that informs the Bible is older than 3.7 billion years by infinity.

Our consciousness survives as ONE...the self for about 100 years.

Where is the scientific equals sign for a formula beginning and end that says
3.7 billion years = 3.7 billion years as the science answer.

Then a male human places his own information above that of his own answer.
 
Top