VoidCat
Pronouns: he/him/they/them
Guilty.Totally forgivable. You probably spelt it the way you'd pronounce it.
That's exactly what I did
Edit:
Im from the south we don't english very well
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Guilty.Totally forgivable. You probably spelt it the way you'd pronounce it.
Yawl got thet right.You just got to fergive yer southen neighbers. We have ar own way of pronuns'ashun.
Technically, no one does English well. That's probably why it sucks and is taking over the world of language.Guilty.
That's exactly what I did
Edit:
Im from the south we don't english very well
We had a related problem in Europe. Big pharma (which is also big farmer) tried to patent all seeds and plants and wanted all non approved food to be forbidden from cultivating, harvested or consumed, even in a private garden.Maine becomes the first US state to recognize the Right to Food in a Constitutional amendment | Universal Rights Group
Maine has become the first state to write in food production and consumption into it's constitution. Bringing cottage food laws to the fore.
The amendment, which 60% of Mainers voted in favor of, declares that “all individuals have the right to grow, raise, harvest, produce and consume the food of their own choosing for their own nourishment, sustenance, bodily health and well-being
Let's get this going in all 50 states.
We had a related problem in Europe. Big pharma (which is also big farmer) tried to patent all seeds and plants and wanted all non approved food to be forbidden from cultivating, harvested or consumed, even in a private garden.
I remember that case differently. Wasn't it so that the farmer sued first?That is a problem with GMO's. They will contaminate neighboring crops since bees have no respect!
I should see if I can find it, but there was a farmer in Canada that wanted to grow his own rape seed. The owners of Canola, which is a patented GMO rape seed variation sued him because his seeds had Canola DNA in them. Unbelievable. And I do believe that the farmer lost his case. He then had the brilliant idea of suing Canola because their crops contaminated his plants. Let me see if I can find it.
You just got to fergive yer southen neighbers. We have ar own way of pronuns'ashun.
I thought the south didn't like them silly "prunouns*
Yeah, I edited my post with a link to what happened. My memory failed me. I did tag you so that you would see the edit, but that may not have worked.I remember that case differently. Wasn't it so that the farmer sued first?
It was one reason why Monsanto (now Bayer) was so ... unpopular.
Well, you were right and I was wrong as to who sued first.Yeah, I edited my post with a link to what happened. My memory failed me. I did tag you so that you would see the edit, but that may not have worked.
Well, you were right and I was wrong as to who sued first.
Anyway, that case and other attempts of big pharma to control food production resulted in a ban of "patents for life" in the EU (which is still violated in a select few cases).
And Bayer lost a lot of money by buying Monsanto. That corporation was more toxic than their products.
I agree. For me it was never about the technique of GMOs but about the power it gave to the producers.Okay, I understand that businesses need to get paid for their products. But I am not a fan of how patents are applied to life. I also do not like the hype against GMO's. I think that that hype started largely because of their pushing for patents in Europe. They should have found another solution.
Okay, channeling my eastern mystic side:I agree. For me it was never about the technique of GMOs but about the power it gave to the producers.
Without a 'Right to Garden' Law, It May Be Illegal to Grow Your Own Food - it appears to be an outlier but maybe someone else can find other examples.
I agree. For me it was never about the technique of GMOs but about the power it gave to the producers.