• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

RF (Religious Forums) FIGHT CLUB (without breaking rules)!

MNoBody

Well-Known Member
Buddhism: Ok, lets see if I can write these even faster!
I consider myself a Buddhist too, believing in a version of Anatta and Sunyata, and using Buddhist terminology, mainly from the Mahayana and Esoteric Buddhist sects like those of Japan (Shingon mainly), and things influenced by their ideas also. Contrary to the popular Western sort of interpretation of everything Buddhist as somehow very non-religious and non-spiritual, Buddhism for the majority of its history and even up until today is very much full of all sorts of wacky spiritual content and "Theism" of all sorts, even if people don't like to admit to it, that is what a lot of the content seems to amount to.

If one actually reads the suttas (those deeds and sayings that are attributed to Buddha and his early followers during his life time), one will find a character that isn't very appealing (at least to my sensibilities) that also appears to make absurd and unbelievable claims, that can indeed to be tested, and pretty clearly can be expected to fail spectacularly. Furthermore, we are asked to believe that this person really existed, really did these things, and that his followers could also do the things that are claimed in these writings, and these are generally pretty much appearing to be very literal claims apparently meant to be taken literally and which were traditionally taken quite seriously as real.

The Buddha is very strongly opposed to sex and procreation, and though the lay rabble are allowed to do as they please, as they are next to animals in so many ways from the perspective of the elitist monks, there are strict repercussions for any sort of sexual act, and many other things mentioned in the Vinayaka of the Tripitaka (the set of rules for the true Buddhist monks, the ones who are actually seriously trying to attain the Nibbana and ascend even past the status of Deva). So however kind they might be from these people they beg from in order to live just long enough to acquire enough merit and magic to give themselves the best chances of whatever obscure goal or state of whatever they are seeking out, these people are not expected to be able to achieve this Master state until they too follow the way of the Buddha and the Sangha of Monks.

In order to do this, generally, it is expected that you would go about depriving yourself in various ways because you believe the claims of Buddha and that such a state can even be achieved by all this, which itself seems a bit silly and basically "why?" "Why would it be so?" "How did it come to be so, that it is such, that we should believe such?" "Is any of it really demonstrable?" "How about the claims of the siddhas or whatever one is supposed to be able to do to prove they are really on the right track?" "Why would such a system as is claimed to exist ever come to be anyway?", taking the claims seriously or literally, there is no way to justify them at all, demonstrate them at all, prove them at all.

Very few people seem to have actually read these stories, or read about these claims of magical powers, or read about how some guy was an actor and now his punishment for being an actor is that he is a flying skeleton being nibbled at by birds or something as he flies through the sky, and that people saw this.

That the Buddha just claimed to basically have these things happen or see things and people are like "Oh yeah, whatever you saw, it must be so". At this point, we don't even know he even was anyone or existed at all really.

Same goes for Mahavira and the Jain people and their tales of the former versions and predecessors and all that.

In my opinion, people who claim to be "Buddhist" but basically totally ignore the whole history of the religion or beliefs and basically don't believe in any of the stuff repeatedly described, even go ahead and basically don't follow any of the rules much at all, how are they really Buddhist? Its almost like Christians who do literally nothing but call themselves Christians, except the ones who call themselves Buddhists at least occasionally meditate or something.

So, for as much as they might try to present themselves as the modern wise guys, they make a whole lot of wacky claims, have a whole lot of wacky beliefs that are frankly unbelievable and which they can't seem to actually prove, and then they make a lot of excuses or diversions that "it isn't what matters or is important" or whatever, but they still hold and carry and promote these ideas, many of them which seem to be anti-human, and if followed, would lead to the end of all human life.

Also, the character of the Buddha is really unpleasant seeming if you study it, how he talks to people and treats them, how he abandoned his wife and son, naming his son "Fetter", and jumping out the window, and then really harassing this one guy who had sexual intercourse because his wife was begging him to in order to get pregnant because she wanted a baby (sick animal that she was) and he complied, and the Buddha wailed on him for it and nagging and nagging nyah nyah nyah, horrible little annoying dude. Like seriously, it makes a person want to say "Shaddap Pal". Go ahead and read the Suttas, find these ridiculous stories and be critical. They claim the Buddha asks people not to just believe things but to be critical, well guess what, its not hard to see how it can't be logically reasoned or concluded in many ways, only some of it, and barely at that, and in other cases its just totally out there.

This is coming from an actual super-human who has in-fact experienced things like those Siddhis or Siddhas and whatever, but not by the means described in the suttas, whereas those who follow the suttas very closely can't seem to generate those results at all except at best through magic tricks and fraud (which they aren't supposed to do, but they've been doing it here and there anyway, because, why not? Mess up, get another chance).

The Buddha also had some funny incidents and stories and enemies, and also the Buddhists spoke out against certain ideas and competing cults and philosophies which seemed to have ideas that may be represented even today (and might even be more sensible, logical, and believable than their own claims).

I think that a lot of the stuff in the Buddhist writings can even be considered more unbelievable or unjust in some ways than things found in the Bible, and that seems pretty hard to top when it comes to silly stuff, but when you have a guy who was just an entertainer being punished as a flying skeleton being picked at by birds or whatever.

Anyway, despite all that silliness, I am very frequently immersed in Buddhist material, and consider Vairocana, Avalokitesvara, the Dharmakaya, all that stuff, Amitabha, taken in certain ways to be real, true, effective, working, testable, fruitful, enjoyable, and that these are not human beings or men, nor are they men or ever were they men, but many of the stories which use these terms refer to men sometimes and humans in stories and other creatures. Praying Dharanis also appear to work, and making sense of their functioning is inexplicable with Atheistic ideas or other sorts of reasoning, they work (in my opinion), when they seem to work, without even knowing what is being said, because something is able to listen and respond and influence what comes after apparently, and thus us present and aware. That is the real, ever-present, Almighty Buddha, not Siddhartha Gautama the Shakyamuni man, and he was not any more than any other man, however different he may have wanted to set himself apart from the regular human activities and general "attachments".

More on the way from the list, feel free to take from that list or talk about anything!
have you read the book "Siddhartha" by Hermann Hesse?
 

Secret Chief

nirvana is samsara
Atheism:
The Atheists and I probably differ very little, the only difference being that I worship God and they don't acknowledge that word as being useful to describe anything that is real or capable of helping them. I say they are missing out. Furthermore, one of the latest popular statements invented by Atheists perhaps is this "Look at this list of Gods (then they list a bunch), we believe in just one less", maybe I've misquoted it, but what this little interesting thought experiment seems to be about is that the modern Monotheists reject all the past Gods as False and Unreal, and the Atheists reject all those and the Monotheistic God as well, so that is just one more than the Monotheists.

Atheists, and I, both think we believe in what is well reasoned, and apparent, and do not believe in what can not be reasoned, and is not apparent really or verifiable. We both believe in "Experience" and "The Reality", and the only difference might be that they say "Whatever responsible for everything, our experience, or the reality" is "dead, and nothing, not intelligent, or powerful, just is", and I say "just is, is powerful, intelligent, Like Nothing, Existing/Animating, responsible for the the generation of moments and the experience of change".

Now, the Atheists, are at a disadvantage in several ways. They may be "missing out" on access to (at the very least) the impression that they have some support, can relieve anxiety through prayers to something they (at the very least) might imagine as real. Atheism is almost like Non-Religious Vegetarianism, why would you not partake in these coping mechanisms, especially considering how it shouldn't matter much to you after all?

I have heard many Atheists describe religions and religious thinking for them to be more distressing than comforting, so maybe they are people who just can't seem to "do it right" for their own apparent benefit and enjoyment.

Of course, you can't make a person believe something they are totally stuck on not believing or being able to believe. For example, if I insisted that God can only mean a Unicorn and the word can only be used to refer to Unicorn, and that I don't believe Unicorns exist, no one can make me belief in a Unicorn and I can't successfully really get the genuine joy of believing in Unicorns if I am just pretending and don't have the Unicorn spearing my heart.

That is why, "The New Man" (which may have existed in the past as well in larger numbers than may be known or recognized), seems in many ways lost on some of their vestigial pleasure providing sensory systems, born spiritually circumcized, lacking in the pleasure of devotional delusion, not attracted to intercourse with The God due to the numbness they feel regarding the concept they have settled upon as by definition dead, and not being necrophiliacs either (like perhaps the Christians might be said to be, or those who worship Osiris or Tammuz maybe, Gods that Die or Died).

Furthermore, if the others are correct, many others, the Atheists will be at the disadvantage again, not only having wasted their lives being unable to enjoy worship or prayer or deluding oneself into thinking there may be another life or extended hopes and a place and a way to be better comforted besides "at least I'll be dead someday and unable to experience anything", but will then have to face (all too late according to these many others) how they had been so wrong, and that the Evil Overlord was actually real, and now they are going to Prison for some stupid infractions, darnit! So all their life of denying and refraining from eating the meat of Prayers amounts to nothing but a life missing out followed by a life of suffering. Truly, that seems like the story of a total Loser in the most literal sense, someone at a loss who can't even gain!

I believe in All those Gods that the Atheists have enjoyed claiming don't exist, because in some senses or interpretations or ways of taking them, those Gods are just words for things that we all know and admit appear to exist. Not only do they exist as words, they exist also as references to things we all see and know. Who denies Thor? Thor means Thunder. You would be a lying fool to say that Thunder only refers to nothing and there is no thunder. Clearly there is Thunder, there is no denying there is Thunder. Yet, what the Atheist denies, is the same as what I would also deny, that there is no Cartoonish entirely literal man in the sky with a mallot bashing things and making that sound, but its unlikely that plain words like Thunder and Thor were being used by people who actually believed such things (but maybe they did, who cares, they are dead, and whether they lived as idiots, they are then dead idiots all the same and have nothing to do with us, we didn't know them, can't know them, can't know what they really thought, though it seems evident that human beings were roughly the same throughout the past in their brain functioning and were most likely being poetic and only symbolically anthropomorphizing things, but even if they weren't, who gives a dang?! This is about us now, and what is available and left to us now, and how to make words mean what is false seeming or what is true seeming and in accordance with what we know or see or experience or the clear Reality).


To Be Continued (Upcoming):
Buddhism
Hinduism
Shinto
Paganism
Ancient Religions
Philosophies
Hedonism
Nihilism
Materialism
Science
The Bible
The Qur'an
The Vedas
The Hindu Epics
The Hadiths
The Gospels
Bahai
Free Masonry
Occultism
Diabolism / Demonolatry
Hellenism
Native American Spirituality
Folk Beliefs
Taoism
Chinese Traditional Religion
Militarism
Nationalism
Socialism
Communism
Patriotism
Democrats
Republicans
Left
Right
Racism
Eugenics
Terrorism
War
Policing
Technocracy
Technology
Medicine
Genetic Alteration
Transhumanism
Artificial Intelligence Advances
Luddite
Occasionalism
Panentheism
Pantheism
Overpopulation
Procreation
Voodoo
Hoodoo
Santeria
Magick
Magic
Palo Mayombe
Allah
Unicorns
God
Odin
Thor
Shiva
Vishnu
Krishna
Rama
Hanuman
Ganesh
Tezcatlipoca
Aphrodite
Inari
Homosexuality
Pre-Marital Sex
Misogyny
Chauvinism
Human Rights
Human Rights Abuses
Abortion
Genocide
Politicians
Cults
Scientology
New Religions
The New Age
Edgar Cayce
Sigmund Freud
Carl Jung
Executions
Institutionalization
De-Institutionalization
Euthanasia
Animal Euthanasia
Feeding and Supporting the Poor
Charity
Fasting
Prayer
Worship
Murder
Rape
Pedophilia
Revenge
Horror Films
Violence in Media
Violence in Games
Video Games
Computers
Modern Phones
Social Media
Internet
Dawkins
Darwin
Reality
Truth
Disease
Magical Energy/Esoteric Energies/Vibes
Hippies
Non-Medicinal Drug Use or Recreational Drug Use
Drug Use
Intoxication
Pollution
Vegetarianism

Impressive. You seem able to mass debate without the need for others.
 
have you read the book "Siddhartha" by Hermann Hesse?

Yeah, I think I have, if not entirely, then partially, but I've forgotten all about it mainly, so that when someone asked me a few years ago "have you read it?" and I was like yeah, I think so, and they were like "remember the ending, what happened in the end", and I was like "hmm, no, can you remind me?", lol it was sort of embarrassing. I should probably just say I don't remember.
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
"compete in the truth, in good deeds, in explanations, in refinements, into coming to better, into coming to the best."

That certainly doesn't seem like the Muslim religion of today....the one that bombs pizza restaurants in Israel to make sure that teenagers (with all their promise ahead of them) are blown up. That doesn't seem like the Muslim religion that repeatedly bombed the world trade center prior to the 911 attack. Apparently the goal falls far short of the reality. True that we are all imperfect, but at least we should strive for perfection.
 

SeekerOnThePath

On a mountain between Nietzsche and Islam
What is love?


Look at the world you live in!

Traumatic insemination - Wikipedia

Love seems to be a word, bandied about and thrown here and there, to refer to some kind of manic sensation that doesn't match up apparently with anything much in reality. If there is any "true love" it seems rather rare overall.

What we do have, seem to be chemicals flowing through our veins, things telling us to pursue things, and we have an agenda. How is it not always conditional and conditioned? How is it not destructive when it is absolutely unconditional?

After you answer what is love, then tell me, where is the love?


The love is conditional, the love is a sensation, here is how it seems to work:

Something give you pleasure, you want to extend that pleasure and that it continues to occur, so you protect and care for and take care of this thing that you love, so that it continues to be able to provide you with pleasure.

Is that really something to make such a big fuss about?

Is that really something that voids out all the other stuff?

How can one claim that what even "allows" the suffering is at all benevolent or "loving", would you allow your own beloved spouse or child or pet be lit on fire and do nothing at all about it? You have all the power in the world (let's say) and you just stand by and watch, and you tell me you LOVE ME?! YOU LOVE ME?!

You're kidding me! That is Sadism, that is Sick!

Lets say you loved me, or someone loved you, and they never told you, all they did was sent you a virus that makes you feel like you can't breath. Makes sense? No way.

Lets say you were the creator, and you could invent anything, and you invent all this, and you could make people strong, but you make them weak, and you could make them happy, but you make them sad, and able to be sad, and miserable, and you make their lives full of losses, over and over again, decaying, losing, things falling away, changing for the worse and the worse. You didn't have to, but you did, is that Love?

No, actually, its Hate. So it could be said, with far more proof, that you are despised, you are punished, you are tortured even before you've committed any crime or spread any harm. From the day you were born you suffer and begin your process of decay and destruction, furthermore, in order to survive you continue your wide rolling destruction upon the Earth, through killing, killing plants and animals, and mashing them in what few teeth you have left, and turning things that were beautiful, into literal feces, that smells, and can kill people if they eat it, or give them suffering or death because of things like bacteria which can poison them or toxins. Maybe you poop rainbows though, since you believe in this "Love". Even if you did poop rainbows, and could eat them, rainbows are made of light, and would not provide you with much of any nutrients, and so you would starve, and die, and not know what your future or fate will be, considering what your fate had been in this life where you were provided with only rainbows to eat and starved to death.

Phew! Talk about some serious Dark Energy eh? Yet, isn't the Truth better than the Lie? Isn't "Love" the Lie really?

Look at these Sexy Girls I've shown you. We love them for their looks, their hawt bods. They give us pleasure, if they distressed us, they would be causing us pain, if we were talk to them, they would likely reject us, and cause us pain, because no one wants to talk to an Ogre, because Love is Conditional, what you describe doesn't really exist much, its just "You give me pleasure, I want you to be rewarded, protected, and live, so that you continue to give me pleasure".

Or do you want people do flourish if they do harm? Do you like those organisms which make children cry out in terror and pain? Do those give you pleasure, do you want them to continue to live? Not if you're sane you don't.

Brilliant post, both humorous and true.

"When you have proved that God is merely a name for the sex instinct, it appears to me not far to the perception that the sex instinct is God." (Aleister Crowley – The Equinox III: 1)


So if God is Love as they say, that means "God is sex", henceforth Left Hand Path Occultism (and Vamachara) I guess :eek:

I'd maybe take that as an axiom less so than a metaphysical ontology, lol
 

SeekerOnThePath

On a mountain between Nietzsche and Islam
Love rules sovereign over all. It conquers all. It makes brothers and sisters of all. No argument or rhetoric or dissertation stands a chance against love. My weapon is love. My armour is love for all humanity. There is no more potent medicine than love. The law of attraction is nothing but the law of love.

What were the most important last words of those held hostage on that ill fated plane? “I love you”. That’s the only thing that mattered then and it’s the only thing that really matters now.

With love, I disarm you all and claim the victory.

Love to you all.

What is love?


Look at the world you live in!

Traumatic insemination - Wikipedia

Love seems to be a word, bandied about and thrown here and there, to refer to some kind of manic sensation that doesn't match up apparently with anything much in reality. If there is any "true love" it seems rather rare overall.

What we do have, seem to be chemicals flowing through our veins, things telling us to pursue things, and we have an agenda. How is it not always conditional and conditioned? How is it not destructive when it is absolutely unconditional?

After you answer what is love, then tell me, where is the love?


The love is conditional, the love is a sensation, here is how it seems to work:

Something give you pleasure, you want to extend that pleasure and that it continues to occur, so you protect and care for and take care of this thing that you love, so that it continues to be able to provide you with pleasure.

Is that really something to make such a big fuss about?

Is that really something that voids out all the other stuff?

How can one claim that what even "allows" the suffering is at all benevolent or "loving", would you allow your own beloved spouse or child or pet be lit on fire and do nothing at all about it? You have all the power in the world (let's say) and you just stand by and watch, and you tell me you LOVE ME?! YOU LOVE ME?!

You're kidding me! That is Sadism, that is Sick!

Lets say you loved me, or someone loved you, and they never told you, all they did was sent you a virus that makes you feel like you can't breath. Makes sense? No way.

Lets say you were the creator, and you could invent anything, and you invent all this, and you could make people strong, but you make them weak, and you could make them happy, but you make them sad, and able to be sad, and miserable, and you make their lives full of losses, over and over again, decaying, losing, things falling away, changing for the worse and the worse. You didn't have to, but you did, is that Love?

No, actually, its Hate. So it could be said, with far more proof, that you are despised, you are punished, you are tortured even before you've committed any crime or spread any harm. From the day you were born you suffer and begin your process of decay and destruction, furthermore, in order to survive you continue your wide rolling destruction upon the Earth, through killing, killing plants and animals, and mashing them in what few teeth you have left, and turning things that were beautiful, into literal feces, that smells, and can kill people if they eat it, or give them suffering or death because of things like bacteria which can poison them or toxins. Maybe you poop rainbows though, since you believe in this "Love". Even if you did poop rainbows, and could eat them, rainbows are made of light, and would not provide you with much of any nutrients, and so you would starve, and die, and not know what your future or fate will be, considering what your fate had been in this life where you were provided with only rainbows to eat and starved to death.

Phew! Talk about some serious Dark Energy eh? Yet, isn't the Truth better than the Lie? Isn't "Love" the Lie really?

Look at these Sexy Girls I've shown you. We love them for their looks, their hawt bods. They give us pleasure, if they distressed us, they would be causing us pain, if we were talk to them, they would likely reject us, and cause us pain, because no one wants to talk to an Ogre, because Love is Conditional, what you describe doesn't really exist much, its just "You give me pleasure, I want you to be rewarded, protected, and live, so that you continue to give me pleasure".

Or do you want people do flourish if they do harm? Do you like those organisms which make children cry out in terror and pain? Do those give you pleasure, do you want them to continue to live? Not if you're sane you don't.

So what is your armor really? Rainbows. They can not protect you, despite what the Bible may say.


Your loved ones, love you, BECAUSE, and if you were bad, a monster, and they loved you, they themselves would be wicked and destructive for doing so. It is only that you are lovely to them that you are loved by them.

We seek the approval of The Master, and The Master, who has invented these concepts such as "lies" and "love" in all its form, is also responsible for everything else and their opposites, and these are merely novelties, they do not rule the Universe, they can be made into nothing, and if God really loved you, so much would be missing from your experience and your life, and if God really hated you, he'd likely make you like any of us, weak, and afraid, and in doubt, when God has all the wealth and bounty, freedom to create all and any reality, yet gives you THIS? Then tells you to be grateful for it! You call that your buddi?


Yet at the same time, I am not very partial to the "God is love" sentiment, it (in it's common de-esotericized interpretations) basically turns God from the Absolute Eternal Reality into a small little weakling that needs others.
This is not what I respect and not what I worship.

In terms of "Old Testament vs New Testament", whilst I (like @The Artis Magistra) have my eers with the "Old Testament", I still find the view of God presented in there far more compelling and far more worthy of universal divinity and authority over the universe, than the one painted by Christians in their reading of the New Testament.

A God of pure wrath, fire, destruction and judgement has a truly magical quality to it, even the thought of that even feels exciting. It makes me at least want to travel out to the Sahara desert and build a Tabernacle.

On the other end though God as conveyed in the Qur'an by God itself, is far more restrained and logical than the Old Testament depiction, though the aspect of judgement and supreme power is still there, but within other central, even feminine, qualities like Compassion (al-Rahman) and Mercy (al-Rahim) both part of the Basmala.




I say this in distinction to what we do. Because love is important for us (family, spouses and children), and how we relate to both each other and to God. But in this distinction, I find it less appealing applied to God.
 
Yet at the same time, I am not very partial to the "God is love" sentiment, it (in it's common de-esotericized interpretations) basically turns God from the Absolute Eternal Reality into a small little weakling that needs others.
This is not what I respect and not what I worship.

In terms of "Old Testament vs New Testament", whilst I (like @The Artis Magistra) have my eers with the "Old Testament", I still find the view of God presented in there far more compelling and far more worthy of universal divinity and authority over the universe, than the one painted by Christians in their reading of the New Testament.

A God of pure wrath, fire, destruction and judgement has a truly magical quality to it, even the thought of that even feels exciting. It makes me at least want to travel out to the Sahara desert and build a Tabernacle.

On the other end though God as conveyed in the Qur'an by God itself, is far more restrained and logical than the Old Testament depiction, though the aspect of judgement and supreme power is still there, but within other central, even feminine, qualities like Compassion (al-Rahman) and Mercy (al-Rahim) both part of the Basmala.




I say this in distinction to what we do. Because love is important for us (family, spouses and children), and how we relate to both each other and to God. But in this distinction, I find it less appealing applied to God.

It is true that for all my complaints about the Old Testament, I am pressured or find it more effective to use the Old Testament to discuss things with its believers, and mainly don't bring up the Qur'an with them, and have found enough quotes present in the Old Testament (even the New as well, since there are people who don't care as much about the Old Testament) to present God as the Controller of Reality and Experience Responsible For Whatever At All Ever Happens.

I've probably quoted the Old Testament online far more than any other scripture due to mostly engaging with people who either believe it or deny it, but who are not interested at all in hearing or seeing anything the Qur'an has to say, because to them, the book is from the beginning Invalid and unworthy of any consideration, so is basically useless as any sort of tool to convince people of any point, except maybe if I am trying to convince people that the Qur'an is bad, then I can quote practically any verse and people will be like "Definitely, unintelligible rubbish". I consider that reaction literally miraculous and highly spiritual, I get to see magic right before my eyes, that people can't see what appears totally obvious to me, so that we are so different (them and I) that one of us would have to be completely crazy (in my opinion, and yeah, it is more likely to be me than them, right?).

My God Concept appears to have enough support through the quotes of the Old Testament and New Testament interpreted in some ways. The Old Testament Concept (a God that doesn't need to be born as a man, descend into Hades, and be resurrected, or called Son to Himself, or whatever ultimate weirdness) is surely closer than the Christian or Trinitarian Concepts, as the Old Testament has quotes indicating the belief that God is generating the events, both bad and good, and is not really human at all.

Most Judeo-Christian people I've talked to, particularly people calling themselves Christians, pretty strongly and heavily seem to (even if denying it overtly on occasion) think of God as a human being one way or another, either human in thoughts, human in form, some sort of Man, even if a Powerful Magical Man.

This is likely why so many Atheists (or all that I've encountered) seem to also be stuck thinking that God can only be used to refer to some Man-God concept, and even when they say they mean anything else as well, it seems that for the most part all that is on their mind is a Man-God concept ever and things taken pretty literally, not dissimilar to some Christians (which many of them were raised as and used to be).

This is also why so many go into cults possibly, and come to practically worship actual men and man-figures they say are God in some way, or Manifestations of God, or God on Earth, or God right before us, or Speaking for God as God One with God, just like they might think of Jesus, and many of them have grown up with Man-like concepts and images that were called "God" to them since their infancy.

I can only Thank God that this disease of the mind was not the disease given to me, and my growing misanthropy may have protected me from any variant of the Man-God Mind Disease.

When people say to me "I believe in God", whether Muslims, Christians, Hindus (the three main big ones), maybe throw in the Sikhs even and other "Bridging" type groups or Post Muslim/Christian/Hindu groups (as well as those consider Pre like the Zoroastrians, though their issues with Islam seem to have influenced them a lot and what they are now seems to be a Post-Islamic revision as well), it means nothing to me almost, or that they are more than likely differing in very significant ways from my own beliefs, and also that they may be worse off than the Atheists for believing in whatever God concept they might. How disappointed I was when I heard from South East Asian Muslim people how God was sitting on a Throne up on the Seventh Heaven in such a literal interpretation and thought. Their God was not my God, not at all, not even close, so how could I be considered their Brother really or a Muslim like them or them a Muslim like me? We're not the same, not even similar, because the Concept of God is literally the Core underlying all the rest, if it differs, it doesn't matter if you both wear clothes and do the same dance, your hearts are entirely un-alike.

So on this website even, though I jump around, neither are the Atheists like me, nor are most of the Theists like me, and ironically, I think the Atheists in their denial of Man-God figures and their thinking of God as referring to such almost exclusively, and the Theists quite often doing the same, as well as the Agnostics saying "well there might be a God (meaning a Man-God figure)" are more alike to each other than me, even as they deny each other. Furthermore, their "Way of Life" is also most similar to each other, their hygiene is most similar to each other, their practices, their morality, all of it is the same.

In my view, these are all One People, and their differences aren't as big as they may even think, and I basically must think of them as "Kaffirs". The term which (more gently) may mean "One Concealed from the Truth or Concealing the Truth with and in their thoughts, words, expressions, and actions" but basically means "Wrong to the point of Bad, Rotten Error, Mentally Diseased". Yeah, just like people like to say that Muhammed was a madman, the Qur'an refers to what it calls the "Heart", which seems to be the old word for what we call "The Mind" today more commonly, and seems to be meaning the "Region of Reasoning" or "What Reasons, What Decides, the Seat of Understanding" and says that this region or this faculty of Understanding is Diseased in a great many people (a disease perpetrated by none other than Allah deliberately). So, most of the time, the Qur'an is basically seeming to accuse a whole lot of people of being literally helplessly mentally ill and genuinely unable to ever free themselves from the disease, and that it is not the interest or intention of Allah, the one who gave them their form and mal-formed them and filled them up with disease, to change them or cure them, they were literally born to be bad, b-b-b-bad, and there is nothing anyone at all can ever do about it (except Allah, if Allah wills to do so ever).

Isn't that just terrible!? Even worse, to hold such a worldview (as I do) and thus such a poor opinion of most of humanity (as I do), and also not knowing when ever we ourselves me have some other Disease, as I only know God as one that diseases people with one way or another, and I know that I'm certainly infected. The Infection leads to Red-Eyed Hate (of what is perceived as untruth and injustices or cruelty) and Unyielding Obsession (with God, even while disliking the state, or God, or God's decisions, or actions attributed to God or considered God's actions and deeds).

"Their Hearts are Alike"

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the Qur'an as a scripture is not one of "Love" really, but very much can be considered filled to the bubbling brim with Malice, Hatred, and what many people might call "Darkness", and it is by all means the product of what they would call "The Devil" as in "The Spirit Responsible for Evil" which many use to refer to "The Evil God" in their imaginations. So that the accusations of many of the people through history, and even today, (concerning the Qur'an) seem to have the ring of truth in some ways. They say "Death Cult", "Evil God", "Product of Satan (meaning The Enemy or Adversary), all of this can be taken in true ways, and yeah, The Qur'an makes itself out to be "The Enemy" to the people who despise it.

Then there are those like us, who have entered the Warp (Warhammer lol) and returned deeply twisted with our twisted addiction to The Chaos (God), and holding our Living Tome which seems to look at us with its bloody eye and open to where it does to speak to us and into our hearts.

The Dark Lord, which even the Satanists and Luciferians scarcely can comprehend (as they are quite often Christians for life, unable to untangle themselves from the Man-God disease of the mind still), is Manifest through the whole of Reality. Even the happy people call upon his name, Krishna, Kal, Kubera (K K K):


 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Since you've prodded atheists AND posted a Men at Work video, I feel somewhat compelled to respond. But I do my best work in the Jokes thread. Here I need to be somewhat serious. So I'm wearing my big boy pants.

Atheism:
The Atheists and I probably differ very little, the only difference being that I worship God and they don't acknowledge that word as being useful to describe anything that is real or capable of helping them. I say they are missing out.

There's a difference between thinking there is a literal God, and worshipping said God, though. In that lies a difference between you and at least SOME atheists. Myself included.

Furthermore, one of the latest popular statements invented by Atheists perhaps is this "Look at this list of Gods (then they list a bunch), we believe in just one less", maybe I've misquoted it, but what this little interesting thought experiment seems to be about is that the modern Monotheists reject all the past Gods as False and Unreal, and the Atheists reject all those and the Monotheistic God as well, so that is just one more than the Monotheists.

No doubt it's used as some sort of 'snappy' comeback at times. But as an atheist you do hear lots of 'I can't understand how you can think God isn't real!' more than you might think.
Comparing our non-belief in Jehovah to a Christians non-belief in Shiva is kind of a short cut to get them to realise there are beliefs that some find completely natural that they don't have. Just like us.

Atheists, and I, both think we believe in what is well reasoned, and apparent, and do not believe in what can not be reasoned, and is not apparent really or verifiable. We both believe in "Experience" and "The Reality", and the only difference might be that they say "Whatever responsible for everything, our experience, or the reality" is "dead, and nothing, not intelligent, or powerful, just is", and I say "just is, is powerful, intelligent, Like Nothing, Existing/Animating, responsible for the the generation of moments and the experience of change".

I don't think of myself as particularly well reasoned. And I believe in plenty of things I can't prod with a stick. Even where evidence of their existence is sometimes lacking. Like justice, for example.

Now, the Atheists, are at a disadvantage in several ways. They may be "missing out" on access to (at the very least) the impression that they have some support, can relieve anxiety through prayers to something they (at the very least) might imagine as real. Atheism is almost like Non-Religious Vegetarianism, why would you not partake in these coping mechanisms, especially considering how it shouldn't matter much to you after all?

You say at the very least we might imagine God to be real. There are lots of people who pray to a God they don't quite believe in. They can be found all over the world. Most of them don't identify as atheists, though. To both be an atheist, and to self identify as one is to require an honest belief that there is no God to pray to. So why would we?

I have, at various times in my life, meditated. I found it useful.

I have heard many Atheists describe religions and religious thinking for them to be more distressing than comforting, so maybe they are people who just can't seem to "do it right" for their own apparent benefit and enjoyment.

Meh...atheists can be religious.
But if you've heard atheists talk about how some religious concepts are more distressing than comforting it can be around concepts of death, of 'Gods plan', or similar vague platitudes some use to cope with things.
It's not about the latest catchy tune at the local Pentocostal on the weekend.

If others find them comforting, more power to them. I find some concepts which are supposedly comforting as actively irritating. But only when they're being directed to/at me. Others can choose what comforts them.

Of course, you can't make a person believe something they are totally stuck on not believing or being able to believe. For example, if I insisted that God can only mean a Unicorn and the word can only be used to refer to Unicorn, and that I don't believe Unicorns exist, no one can make me belief in a Unicorn and I can't successfully really get the genuine joy of believing in Unicorns if I am just pretending and don't have the Unicorn spearing my heart.

All people have things they believe and things they don't. We can give the appearance of belief...or non belief...easy enough. But the fact of it is the fact of it, and we can at best indirectly influence it only.
Being honest with yourself about what you believe and why seems the best policy. I keep things simple.

That is why, "The New Man" (which may have existed in the past as well in larger numbers than may be known or recognized), seems in many ways lost on some of their vestigial pleasure providing sensory systems, born spiritually circumcized, lacking in the pleasure of devotional delusion, not attracted to intercourse with The God due to the numbness they feel regarding the concept they have settled upon as by definition dead, and not being necrophiliacs either (like perhaps the Christians might be said to be, or those who worship Osiris or Tammuz maybe, Gods that Die or Died).

Hah! Perhaps...lol


Furthermore, if the others are correct, many others, the Atheists will be at the disadvantage again, not only having wasted their lives being unable to enjoy worship or prayer or deluding oneself into thinking there may be another life or extended hopes and a place and a way to be better comforted besides "at least I'll be dead someday and unable to experience anything", but will then have to face (all too late according to these many others) how they had been so wrong, and that the Evil Overlord was actually real, and now they are going to Prison for some stupid infractions, darnit! So all their life of denying and refraining from eating the meat of Prayers amounts to nothing but a life missing out followed by a life of suffering. Truly, that seems like the story of a total Loser in the most literal sense, someone at a loss who can't even gain!

You're not just talking about atheists, here. You're talking about lots of theists, deists, pantheists, panentheists and @Mindmaster.
(Sorry...couldn't resist prodding you, mate...lol)

Anyone that doesn't have the specific type of beliefs you are highlighting here.
And, whilst I know your tongue was in your cheek, and I'm taking this whole thread pretty lightly, I'm no nihilist. And most atheists I've met...quite a few at this point...aren't either. And nor are we hedonists, by and large.

I believe in All those Gods that the Atheists have enjoyed claiming don't exist, because in some senses or interpretations or ways of taking them, those Gods are just words for things that we all know and admit appear to exist. Not only do they exist as words, they exist also as references to things we all see and know. Who denies Thor? Thor means Thunder. You would be a lying fool to say that Thunder only refers to nothing and there is no thunder. Clearly there is Thunder, there is no denying there is Thunder. Yet, what the Atheist denies, is the same as what I would also deny, that there is no Cartoonish entirely literal man in the sky with a mallot bashing things and making that sound, but its unlikely that plain words like Thunder and Thor were being used by people who actually believed such things (but maybe they did, who cares, they are dead, and whether they lived as idiots, they are then dead idiots all the same and have nothing to do with us, we didn't know them, can't know them, can't know what they really thought, though it seems evident that human beings were roughly the same throughout the past in their brain functioning and were most likely being poetic and only symbolically anthropomorphizing things, but even if they weren't, who gives a dang?! This is about us now, and what is available and left to us now, and how to make words mean what is false seeming or what is true seeming and in accordance with what we know or see or experience or the clear Reality).

It would be interesting to see you wander the streets of Riyadh telling people you believe in all the Gods, and furthermore that you understand them to be allegorical. As for me...I've got plenty of books on my shelf filled with myths, creation stories, and other cultural carriers. Far, far, far more than books about atheism (of which I have 2).
The tales are interesting, sometimes thought provoking, and captured my imagination when I was young. That's never really changed.
Thunder is real. And you can worship Thor and you see fit. I don't, and that lack of theism marks me an atheist.

Since you had the good grace to offer a Men at Work clip, I'll respond with an acoustic version of Overkill by the lead singer (Colin Hay)
Worth a listen!

 
@lewisnotmiller Thank you so much, that was a beautiful response, instantly entertaining, I enjoyed reading the whole thing. I also enjoyed the little snippets of my own writing, I thought that it was really nicely written, funny, thought provoking.

I loved your definition as well, narrowing it down slightly differently from my own (mine was that the differences between Theists and Atheists are that the Theist claim to believe in God(s) or any sort and the Atheist deny God(s) of all sorts, and that more narrowly, one such as myself believes in an intelligent power that can respond whereas Atheists are assumed to mainly not believe in such even, so reject any suggestion or opportunity to interact with it in that fashion), which was that you the difference you made between one such as myself and Atheists is mainly that the Atheist doesn't pray. I really liked that and found it very interesting. The Qur'an also seems to end up placing a degree of focus on praying or worship as a differentiating factor also.

Yet, like you mentioned in your great post, there are many people most likely who claim to be one thing but aren't really. That there may be people even offering prayers even but not really believing or ever believing at all, and I said something earlier which was like "they can't" meaning, I know how it feels to be able to believe or not believe stuff, like there are so many things I don't believe and because I don't believe them I don't follow any practices or procedures regarding them, and thankfully no one seems to be pushing me into doing such or pushing me around about things I don't believe in. Truly, to imagine the oppression that some young people must go through with their families and their families beliefs that they don't agree with, that is totally a type of psychological torment and a human rights violation as well no doubt, but then one may say "if the parents can't determine what is best for their child while raising them, then who does, the State? What if the State then starts to impose things or restrict things which are troubling to the little whiny brat now?".

Luckily, I despise young people, every year more, as I grow increasingly into a curmudgeonly butterfly.

As for Nihilism and Hedonism, two oft-maligned words, I subscribe to both of them, as a mainly Nihilistic Hedonist. I take the terms in their more meaningful and serious versions, rather than their "insult forms" that people most often seem to use, and that is something like:

Nihilism - There is no intrinsic value to anything at all, everything is entirely void of meaning automatically.

Which goes well with

Hedonism - The Sensation of Pleasure and what one may consider Pleasurable is the "Highest Good" that they can ever attain to, whether psychological, physical, or whatever else, so that "Feeling Good" is Pleasure, and Pleasure is all that matters and is best of all, and in contrast Pain and Suffering and the Sensation of Displeasure and what one may consider Displeasing and Painful or causing Suffering like Anxiety or Physical Pain and all forms of Distress are "The Worst Evil", worse than Non-Existence (which is lacking any sort of pleasure or suffering or awareness of anything at all, which is better than horrific pain, which seems obvious to me, but others may differ on this).

I think that the excuses people make regarding both these things or their denial are puzzling and almost incomprehensible seeming, and really make no sense to me, that is how totally brainwashed I am by Nihilism and Hedonism, Dark Babe and Sexy Babe, my Yin and Michelle.

One Mantra I like is "DEATH AND DESTRUCTION!" so that is another pair that is sort of similar with a second glance, Nihilism = Death, Hedonism = Destruction in that case, and these two words, Death and Destruction, are invested with a tremendous amount of meaning and reference for me, due to their vastness and vagueness in comparison to Nihilism and Hedonism.

Now, even though nothing at all in my opinion has any "right or wrong" or "value" in relation to it necessarily automatically, and thus the Assassin's Creed "Nothing is true; everything is permitted" can be made somewhat more meaningful, I do believe that "right and wrong" are valueless creations and novelties generated by what generates everything whatsoever, and that things are matched up to these for various explicable (to us) reasons (with entirely novel and made up reasons), which all come down to VIOLENCE.

That is, Violence is what ultimately determines what to follow, what not to follow, what to do, and what not to do.

I believe in an Evil and Violent, Malicious Intelligence that generates all these things, then makes some of them "bad and good", then also can create the novel absurdities of "crime and punishment" and "justice" and whatever else, and impose it, and impose it with force, even a force that goes beyond coppers kicking old men and women laying on the ground, but can bring about the absurdity of an actual Judgment, and since mankind's God's are like versions of themselves, inflated so much that they lose their shape and form and become unrecognizable as really just versions of us sometimes, my God is The Joker.

So I think that, with a maniacal God like that, there is more than likely to be a lot of tom-foolery in this life and for lolz a next, which will stun some people "just to see the look on their face, and feel their hearts sink in terror", which my God feels, as "The Sufferer" of all Experience generated, even the Experience of being you, known fully as you know it 100% and even more!

My God is a Necessarily Absurd Humorous, generating from Nothing (or in other words, Itself), all manner of unconditioned, baseless, un-needed novelties that never existed, and some might argue never should have existed, "things", "laws", "truths that weren't always and thus were at one time lies", and whatever else, with no basis, no model. Weird things we take entirely for granted such as the absurd "there are things called faces which have things called noses which do something called protruding which have things called nostrils which are two things called holes, which take in a thing called air, and if they don't, the thing that these things are attached to dies! There is More where That Came From!"

We live in Terror of The Genius.

We (believe) we Know that Nihilism is necessarily True, and that all we (believe) we Know is that Hedonism is all that matters.

If I can get the longest lasting sensation of intense pleasure and peace and goodness, free from distress, then nothing else matters or could by such a definition include any sort of suffering or distress no matter what else may be said to be going on at all.

The opposite of that is the longest lasting sensation of intense suffering and pain and discomfort and distress.

Paradise and Punishment.

We try everything to attain this, everything we can, and calculate everything to maximize our chances of this in everything, for now, and for later potentially.

If something has potential detriments, they are to be weighed against the apparent benefits, and what is detrimental and what is beneficial, are assessed and determined and ranked by Pleasure.

My Lord is Mara, the King of Kamadhatu:
Whose your Daddy? Dan?

I see far, but not further, and so I am short-sighted according to some other people perhaps.

I have no interest in anything beyond "The Pleasure Realms" of "Sensation" and existence, or to become something which does not know the sensations of "Good and Evil", as I'm alright with this level of Monster-Hood and having a God, whereas God is an Atheist and has no one at all to Pray to or rest on.

If there is no joy, then really, what is the point at all of anything or existing in any sense or creating in any sense? It seems totally arbitrary and stupid to do anything for really nothing, and to exchange more for less.

Thus, all the 7 Sins and Virtues that are famous, I take in the best of ways that I can:
I am filled with every one of them, like Greed for certain things (pursuit and acquirement which provide pleasure), Pride in certain things (which gives pleasure), Envy (to look at what seems better and trying to take it for myself), Sloth (trying to find the easiest ways and relaxing), and what else? Wrath or something? Anyway, they are all great the way I use them, and the One Ring, why throw it into lava?!
 
"compete in the truth, in good deeds, in explanations, in refinements, into coming to better, into coming to the best."

That certainly doesn't seem like the Muslim religion of today....the one that bombs pizza restaurants in Israel to make sure that teenagers (with all their promise ahead of them) are blown up. That doesn't seem like the Muslim religion that repeatedly bombed the world trade center prior to the 911 attack. Apparently the goal falls far short of the reality. True that we are all imperfect, but at least we should strive for perfection.

What I described are things one would find or derive from a careful and serious reading of the Qur'an, and doesn't match up to the understanding of many people. Luckily, the Muslims are mainly not even in a majority or a significant minority even actually ever bombing anything at all or part of Terrorism. There are Billions of people who call themselves Muslims, and Billions of those people are for the vast majority of them simple folk living lives like most others in the world, trying to eat and survive and make love and whatever else normal non-terrorist humans do. Most of them probably do not know the Qur'an in the fashion that I do, nor do they likely focus on it as much as I do for the most part of them. It may even be, that people who look to the Qur'an and interpret it the way I do, are a minority even smaller than the very tiny population of actual bombers and terrorists in the world, and terrorists and bombers who call themselves Muslims (compare their number in your most bloated estimates to the total population of people self-identifying or identified as Muslims and you are dealing with about 20 ants many, most of which haven't even done anything anyway, so out of those 20 ants, maybe 2 have actually done bad things rather than just talking about doing bad things).

Regardless, as you and I both know and feel, the picture of the Qur'an and the Muslims doesn't match up with what I described, which is directly mentioned in the Qur'an. The reason it doesn't match up is that many people who are very vocal and providing the impressions on all sides of what is what, don't even know the content of the Qur'an very well and have not developed this sort of religion or religious practice at all. That is why you don't see it much, and see other stuff more on the television or whatever.

What you won't find in the Qur'an is any permission to go blow up Pizza Restaurants, because God tells mankind to eat Pizza basically, so this is completely wrong and Un-Islamic behavior.
 
A God of pure wrath, fire, destruction and judgement has a truly magical quality to it, even the thought of that even feels exciting. It makes me at least want to travel out to the Sahara desert and build a Tabernacle.

On the other end though God as conveyed in the Qur'an by God itself, is far more restrained and logical than the Old Testament depiction, though the aspect of judgement and supreme power is still there, but within other central, even feminine, qualities like Compassion (al-Rahman) and Mercy (al-Rahim) both part of the Basmala.

I say this in distinction to what we do. Because love is important for us (family, spouses and children), and how we relate to both each other and to God. But in this distinction, I find it less appealing applied to God.

Awesome writing! I love it and totally agree and feel the same way!
 

MNoBody

Well-Known Member
in the end, when the dust settles, all that will matter is how we all treated each other....
love and only love will endure.
 
Top