Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Would it be our business if the were to start murdering people [opponents, Kurds, secularists] as Baathists and Islamists often do?It is none of their business...Nor is it ours as to who gets in there.
Sovereign countries should be Just that.
Would it be our business if the were to start murdering people [opponents, Kurds, secularists] as Baathists and Islamists often do?
Many liberals in the US (like the UK) have been agitating for the removal of US troops from Iraq and ending the occupation.
How would you respond if a Baathist-Islamist unholy alliance gained control of the country following the withdrawal?
Would it be our business if the were to start murdering people [opponents, Kurds, secularists] as Baathists and Islamists often do?
but people are already doing this! right while American forces are supposedly trying to keep peace and order!
opponents, religious and ethnic minorities, and those on the wrong side of religious politics *are* being murdered in the street, kidnapped, raped, pulled from cars and shot, etc.
and all while we are there trying to have control and peace and security.
Yes, that was my point. No-one has answered the question however.doppelgänger;835581 said:There is an implied causal connection between these two sentences.
I don't know.doppelgänger said:How long would U.S. troops have to stay to prevent some "unholy alliance" (Baathist, Islamist or otherwise) from taking over "Iraq"?
As if our politicians would actually care about foreign bloodshed. We've ignored the plights in Africa for how long?
They care because of something more expensive than lives: oil.