Audie
Veteran Member
Insult? You insult countless generations ofDo you want to know why I reject it?
1. It's an insult to the human species to think that we went from walking on four legs and scratching our butts all day long to eventually bipedalism where we stopped doing that weird crap... I think. You make the human origin sound humiliating.
2. It doesn't adhere to the scientific method. You cannot observe, test, replicate or even falsify evolution which is a clear indicator it's pseudoscience.
3. the egregious Whale Evolution fraud to promote the evolution agenda. The piltdown man was a great hoax back in the early 20th century to promote evolution for a very long time even though it was artifically created by a few con artists. The Nebraska man fossil which turned out to be a pig's tooth. Lucy definitely is a candidate on the evolution fraud list too as she is clearly shown to hang around in trees much more than being on the ground. After all, she died from falling off a tree!
4. No accepted transitional fossils in the fossil record. Darwin would still be disappointed to this day.
5. There is no known modern treatment made possible due to human evolution. I don't even know how that could be possible anyway if you read number 2 on my list. All experiments are done at a science lab on 'humans' not fictitious in between human variants which don't even exist. Unless you're fantasizing about how some scientists took a time machine back millions of years and experimented on 'that' in between species of course.
ancestors by dismissing their very existence
let alone their struggle and pain that made
YOUR life possible. " Oh, God gave it to us. Free "
That we humans became what we are on our own
is properly a matter of pride. Look what we e done!
That you choose to imagine an insult has nothing to do
with fact anyway, so irrelevant.
2. You are wrong. And I believe against forum rules to call it pseudoscience.
We do note the vast arrogance of claiming- with no
perceptible education- to know more than any scientist on earth.
3. What you choose to wrongly call fraud, even IF IT WERE,
has no bearing on whether the theory is correct.
what you falsely call agenda.
But to be fair, there being any number of actual creationist frauds, don't you think that proves creationism
is fake? Or is your only standard a double one?
4. Your choice to claim there are no transitional,fossils doesnt make it so, it makes you a false witness.
Your choice of lying creationist sires for " facts" says it all.
5 doesn't even make sense.
6 You left out the real reason- that you choose to
be ignorant of science, and you choose to believe
your selected cersi9n if what your selected religion says.