Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
In this Kaliyug, it is almost impossible to self-realization.
Do you mean by enlightenment "Moksha"? I think all Hindu sects, without exception, have the concept of Moksha. Moksha simply means sufficient spiritualization of the practitioner to enable him to transcend the dualities.hello
i just have a question, do all hindus believe in Enlightenment or are there some that dont. because im only educated in Gaudiya Vaishnava and dont know alot about other forms of hinduism and would like to know about other sects.
Thank you!
This is lie spread by ISKCON group.It is just to spread bhakti yoga,but that should not come at cost of maligning Jnana Yoga.How can u say it is impossible?
May be difficult but certainly not impossible.
Actually it says 'almost' impossible. Not absolutely impossible. I was always taught that in Kali Yuga it is much harder to progress and seriously, how many people do you see reaching enlightenment on a daily basis? With all of hte material ditractions it is very difficult to dedicate oneself to spirituality and constant practice.
In the Kali yuga it is difficult,i accept.But still possible considering the fact atleast 5 to 10 people who are enlightened per century.Reincarnation theory says that any spiritual activity is carried over.So,that means any yoga is beneficial in the long run.Yogic practice is atleast as good as bhakti yoga if not better.But there are certain group who use these things to propagate false and rubbish things abt yogic non-dualists.,saying such yogic practice are impossibe in kali yuga.Ex:ISKCON group and their widely distributed works which they use to settle personal biases.
I personally think that neither is better or worse. Bhakti is for those who feel a personal connection and 'yogic' practice is just another means. I personally think that both are important and I have an ISKON background but I do agree that they have a strong bias against anything that isn't Bhakti. It is one thing i disagree with about their line.