Proof against black-holes

[YmirGF]

He should take a peek at Saggitarius A* the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy.

*giggles*

I once saw a NOVA documentary on how the scientists found that one. Pretty impressive stuff.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

He should take a peek at Saggitarius A* the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy.

Oh, so when are you going to take me to see it?
When your UFO gets back from Andromeda?

 

[YmirGF]

A 30 page proof would then be beyond your ken completely:
http://flight-light-and-spin.com/LIGO/Analysis-GW150914-Bain.pdf

No doubt that is why academia is flocking to your doorstep begging you to accept a Nobel prize.


For the record, I've been fascinated by Cosmology and specifically black holes for several decades. I'm actually quite conversant on the topic... enough to know when someone is pulling my leg.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

Say something sensible

I said it all here:
Computational analysis of LIGO gravitational-wave experiment GW150914
but all you want is the cheap instant gratification of one sentence rhetoric, innit?

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

No doubt that is why academia is flocking to your doorstep begging you to accept a Nobel prize.

It generally takes decades for one's life-work to be accepted.
This was published earlier this year.

 

[Corvus]

Oh, so when are you going to take me to see it?
When your UFO gets back from Andromeda?

I am from Messier 63 or the Sunflower galaxy if you must know, not Andromeda, and we are not all smiles and star shine.

''In the past 20 years, astronomers have collected enough evidence through the observed motions of gas and stars to convince ourselves that something very massive lurks at the center of our galaxy. The first dynamical evidence came from the motions of the ionized gas streamers of the mini-spiral orbiting Sgr A*. Using the velocities of the gas estimated from the Doppler shift of spectral lines, astronomers estimated that a mass of six million solar masses must lie within 10 arcseconds of Sgr A*. This did not explicitly prove the existence of a black hole since that amount of matter could be accounted for by a high density of stars within such a large volume....continues here. The Supermassive Black Hole at the Galactic Center

 

[YmirGF]

It generally takes decades for one's life-work to be accepted.
This was published earlier this year.

I seem to recall the ol' Albert gained worldwide recognition pretty quickly. In this age is instantaneous communication, I'd expect CNN to be banging on the door...

 

[Corvus]

I said it all here:
Computational analysis of LIGO gravitational-wave experiment GW150914
but all you want is the cheap instant gratification of one sentence rhetoric, innit?

Where in that page is it claiming black holes do not exist? (I cant be bothered to read it)

 

[Corvus]

I seem to recall the ol' Albert gained worldwide recognition pretty quickly. In this age is instantaneous communication, I'd expect CNN to be banging on the door...

Somehow I don't think our genius here will be getting the recognition he so surely must deserve for his thesis.

 

[Corvus]

I started with the first page and lost interest immediately at the gibberish within.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

I cant be bothered to read

Yes, I can see that.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

and lost interest

then pray tell, why are you still posting about it?

 

[Corvus]

An extract... ''....So I had to ask the question: What is that signal? Can the LIGO group be certain that it is not a submarine from North-Korea using radio navigation off somewhere in the Southern Hemisphere? What of some strange celestial magnetic phenomenon? I felt compelled to develop a structure that would generate a pull by an electromagnetic force so that the OGS11 LIGO detector simulator would be able to ‘detect’ the desired wave-form in orbit-gravity-sim-11.exe.'' What is GW150914 actually? Dude what the hell is that crazy nonsense?

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

I seem to recall the ol' Albert gained worldwide recognition pretty quickly. In this age is instantaneous communication, I'd expect CNN to be banging on the door...

I explain that in this other article:
Gravitational Waves & General Relativity - A Computational Analysis

 

[Corvus]

then pray tell, why are you still posting about it?

Good question, first sensible comment I have seen you post.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

An extract... ''....So I had to ask the question: What is that signal? Can the LIGO group be certain that it is not a submarine from North-Korea using radio navigation off somewhere in the Southern Hemisphere? What of some strange celestial magnetic phenomenon? I felt compelled to develop a structure that would generate a pull by an electromagnetic force so that the OGS11 LIGO detector simulator would be able to ‘detect’ the desired wave-form in orbit-gravity-sim-11.exe.'' What is GW150914 actually? Dude what the hell is that crazy nonsense?

So you think that computer algorithms that simulate theories on physical laws are 'nonsense'?

 

[Corvus]

''The Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) searches for distortions in space-time that would indicate the passage of gravitational waves. A laser beam is split down two 2.5-mile (4 kilometers) arms containing mirrors.10'' Hunting Gravitational Waves with Lasers: How Project LIGO Works (Infographic) This has no connection with radio signals, that might come from North Korean subs or my UFO. You are clearly confused. Radio signals could not affect the experiment to detect deflections in the laser beams.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

Good question, first sensible comment I have seen you post.

Actually I have proven that almost everything you say contradicts your previous comments.
Not surprising that you regurgitate relativity; parroting away that 'nothing can get past the
event horizon, even if it travels at the velocity of light, but gravity can do this whilst travelling
at that very same velocity.

 

[Corvus]

Actually I have proven that almost everything you say contradicts your previous comments..

I am going to smoke some drugs now, I think I have earned it.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

Radio signals could not affect the experiment to detect deflections in the laser beams.

My conclusions are that gw150914 MUST be an electromagnetic pull due to gravity being an instantaneous force;
whereas what was detected was clearly a fluctuation in a force that traveled at the velocity of light.

The proof that gravity is instant is demonstrated in the main article as well as on this thread here:
Proof of instant gravity.

You can also google
instant gravity proof
to find the brief summary of that article
which is current rated 1st out of half a million articles on most search engines.

*yawn*