questfortruth
Well-Known Member
there is no talks of burdens for a truth-seeker"Burden of proof"?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
there is no talks of burdens for a truth-seeker"Burden of proof"?
Dude, I just quoted you.there is no talks of burdens for a truth-seeker
Light was not able to travel very far before being absorbed reemitted. That means that one could not see an object because the light would be quickly scattered. The universe was opaque.So, there was no light prior to light release?
But there is always matter in Universe, why then the CMB release short period of time was so special? Was there special expansion or what?Light was not able to travel very far before being absorbed reemitted. That means that one could not see an object because the light would be quickly scattered. The universe was opaque.
You are missing the point. Until the universe cooked sufficiently, and electrons were associated with specific atoms, the universe was effectively opaque. Yes, there was light but it could only travel very short distances. As it continued to expand it cooled to the point where electrons could permanently combine with atomic nuclei. When that happened the universe became transparent.But there is always matter in Universe, why then the CMB release short period of time was so special? Was there special expansion or what?
So, prior to CMB release the electrons were inside the atoms or maximum close to atoms, so the photons were unable to pass through? That means, that prior to CMB release the Universe was a gigantic neutron star?You are missing the point. Until the universe cooked sufficiently, and electrons were associated with specific atoms, the universe was effectively opaque. Yes, there was light but it could only travel very short distances. As it continued to expand it cooled to the point where electrons could permanently combine with atomic nuclei. When that happened the universe became transparent.
There was no "inside the atoms". It was a plasma universe. Free electrons and bare protons mostly.So, prior to CMB release the electrons were inside the atoms or maximum close to atoms, so the photons were unable to pass through? That means, that prior to CMB release the Universe was a gigantic neutron star?
By the way, what about Pauli rule, that does not allow two electrons to be at same state? Talking about fairytale:
So, there was no light prior to light release?
So, prior to CMB release the electrons were inside the atoms or maximum close to atoms, so the photons were unable to pass through? That means, that prior to CMB release the Universe was a gigantic neutron star?
By the way, what about Pauli rule, that does not allow two electrons to be at same state?
But there is always matter in Universe, why then the CMB release short period of time was so special? Was there special expansion or what?
But the Grand Unified Theory (Strong+Electroweak forces) is not discovered. How then the CMB possible?!
There is a healthy skepticism that evaluates things
There is an unhealthy cynicism... not the same
That post left me scratching my head too. I do think that English may not be his first language. But even so . . .What? Your question does not make any sense, here.
Moreover, what is "Grand Unified Theory"? There is no such thing!