- Standard Sunni Islam states that Muslims must believe in the Quran and the Hadith.
- Quran-only Muslims are considered heretical.
- The Quran is believed to be the perfect word of Allah.
- The hadith not perfect.
My questions are
What is the point of the Quran being perfect if the hadith are not but are essential for Islam?
Why would Allah not include everything required for Islam in his perfect book and do away with the need for Hadith?
An analogy
Imagine I got a gram of the absolute finest, 24-carat gold and mixed it with 99 grams of tin to make a ring. (I know that's a heavy ring) What would be the point of me getting the finest gold only to mix it with a lesser metal to make the ring?
Peace,
Everything contained in the Sunnah is contained in the Quran but in a mysterious way, that's not easy to explain. The problem with writing everything explicitly in terms of laws in a book is the following:
(1) Some morals are dynamic and change with the situation
(2) Guidance in all matters for everyone in every situation would be impossible
(3) Knowledge is cumulative process and doors lead to other doors, but it can't be all given in one go
(4) Implementation of knowledge is different then just reading it
(5) Connecting to the spiritual realm and lanterns therein is essentially main thing Quran wants you to do
Now on point (2), we read in a Du'a Istekhera regarding Quran that we can find for every matter we are looking for guidance with a proof/sign from it in Quran. The Quran itself explains itself to be an explanation to all things. This is impossible if every notion of guidance would be explicitly written.
Now with point (3), for example, Foucault concept of discourse and soft power vs hard power, the concept of wealth being power dynamic in society, power and human rights and purpose of government, all these concepts are there in the Quran, explained in detail. But without having some sort of reflection into these things, you will not know what Quran says about Foucault concept of discourse and soft power vs hard power type political discussion.
What I'm saying is that Quran takes knowledge often to recognize an issue of knowledge.
On point (4), justice can be discussed in theory, but it takes truthful leaders to implement the teaching of justice. It's not good enough to be just in theory or constitution, but you need the right leadership to implement it. Thus the purpose of Islam is to be lived.
On point (5), if you are connected to the Guide and lanterns in the heaven/high realm connected to this world, you will be guided to issues pertaining to Quran. For example, I had a dream where Ahlulbayt (a) were watching me and I solved the issue of malakat aymanihim to not be about slavery from the Muta verse. They played the Zelda song from ocarina of time when you solve a puzzle. I didn't know exact details, but I woke up and looked into the verse. And indeed I solved it in the way of the dream then recalled the details in the dream, and became sure that slavery is not part of Quran.
The Quran opens doors to doors. The verses are woven together, and there is no limit to it's knowledge. Even the Prophet (s) who was most knowledgeable to it and knows it's proper interpretations was said to not hasten regarding it but say "God increase me in knowledge".
You bring a good topic. There is also the issue if others are allowed to talk about Quran, why would we not care for what the Prophet (s) himself said regarding it?
A book of limited words can be unlimited in knowledge, and I believe the Quran is, but Ahlulbayt (a) are definitely needed to not just get deep into it, but to dispel the dark sorcery upon the Quran pertaining to it.