Not really. I think this is a trope, tbh. In fact I'd argue that, at least in Kemeticism, civilisation away from the wilds was seen as the crowning achievement; that we dominate nature, because it's frightening, unpredictable and often trying to kill us. This includes the weather, the animals, the water, toxic things that look edible etc. I think having a healthy fear of nature is a better way of looking at it. A lot of folks love nature until they have to live in it, realising it doesn't love them back.
Good points, but not the entire story in my opinion.
The temple architecture is a very clear example: huge walled enclosure to make a controlled sacred space of Ma'at, all the symbolism of war and hunt on the outside walls: the king subduing the danger of the foreign and natural chaos... All the purification steps, clear rules and rituals. That is truly an attempt of taming the wild world... Or at least keeping it at bay outside the doors.
But there's another side to Kemetic religion. The common people didn't visit the purified interior chambers of a state temple, but they went to offer at small shrines in the hillside, had their household protectors and ancestor worship.
Kemetic deities are still very wild and natural, and can only be pacified and invited into a "civilized" temple at certain moments... See the story of the wandering goddess, see Ra "who's shrine is empty", see Amun the invisible, see Hathor as the wild cow of the marshes...
This is needful for me as Kemet was seen as the Holy Land, but only up to a point as I don't live there so it's less relevent.
Similar for me. I love visiting Egypt, and I hate the cold, wet and darkness of the European winter.
But I can and do see the Kemetic gods in my European environment. Here, too, I have night sky and sun cycles, thunderclouds and rivers, raptor birds, canids, cows, growing plants.
And I also include some local spirits and deities lately, that works far easier than I expected.