• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Oldest Known Hebrew Writing

gnostic

The Lost One
This is what I found in today's papers.

&squo;Oldest&squo; Hebrew text found | Herald Sun

The oldest Hebrew text was found from broken pottery in a valley, said to be the location of where David battled Golaith.

The shard of pottery has been dated about 3000 years ago, the time of David.

What do you think of this discovery?
 
Last edited:

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
Yossi Garfinkel, The archaeologist who presented the discovery (made south of Jerusalem) claims it may be an inscription in Hebrew, but that is yet to be fully determined. many archaeologists would say its too rush to make such a claim.
the alphabet used in the inscription is Proto-Canaanite from which the Hebrew alphabet is derived, but it will take a while to decipher all the words and get a picture of what language the inscription is in.

just for general knowledge, almost all known alphabet systems in use today are derived from Proto-Canaanite via the Phoenician (the latin alphabet, Greek alphabet, Aramaic, Arabic etc.).
 

gnostic

The Lost One
caladan said:
Yossi Garfinkel, The archaeologist who presented the discovery (made south of Jerusalem) claims it may be an inscription in Hebrew, but that is yet to be fully determined. many archaeologists would say its too rush to make such a claim.

Naturally.

The newspaper that I 1st read only had a few line, but their website had a fairly bit more of the article. The article does say they have fully decipher the texts.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Yossi Garfinkel, The archaeologist who presented the discovery (made south of Jerusalem) claims it may be an inscription in Hebrew, but that is yet to be fully determined. many archaeologists would say its too rush to make such a claim.
While the site could be useful to scholars, archeologist Yisrael Finkelstein of Tel Aviv University urged adhering to the strict boundaries of science.

Finkelstein, who has not visited the dig but attended a presentation of the findings, warned against what he said was a "revival in the belief that what's written in the Bible is accurate like a newspaper."

That style of archeology was favored by 19th century European diggers who trolled the Holy Land for physical traces of biblical stories, their motivation and methods more romantic than scientific.

"This can be seen as part of this phenomenon," Finkelstein said. [source]
Precisely ...
 

anders

Well-Known Member
It would have been more interesting if the name David was written on it. But even so, it would have been no proof of a King David.
 
Top