EndlessArising
Member
Sat-chit-ananda is not a loka. It is the naure of being. All that we do or say depends on this primeval nature. Without existence, without cognition, and without the bliss the dream will not continue for a moment. Loka is the dream.
You may wish to first understand the terminologies from within Hinduism.
I understand the terminologies quite well. According to Buddhism, sat chit ananda leads to rebirth in a formless realm because of the fixation on infinite space.
There are no permanent realms in Buddhism. This, for instance, is the desire realm.
Buddhist cosmology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Liberation for the Brahminic yogin was thought to be the permanent realization at death of a nondual meditative state anticipated in life. . . The Buddha taught that these meditative states alone do not offer a decisive and permanent end to suffering either during life or after death.[104]
He stated that achieving a formless attainment with no further practice would only lead to temporary rebirth in a formless realm after death.[105] Moreover, he gave a pragmatic refutation of early Brahminical theories according to which the meditator, the meditative state, and the proposed uncaused, unborn, unanalyzable Self, are identical.[106] These theories are undergirded by the Upanishadic correspondence between macrocosm and microcosm, from which perspective it is not surprising that meditative states of consciousness were thought to be identical to the subtle strata of the cosmos.[107] The Buddha, in contrast, argued that states of consciousness come about caused and conditioned by the yogi's training and techniques, and therefore no state of consciousness could be this eternal Self
Buddhism and Hinduism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia