Druidus
Keeper of the Grove
First answer the 19 questions at this site:
http://www.philosophersnet.com/games/morality_play.htm
Remember, you are to answer what is morally right, not necessarily what you would do in the situation. Read each question carefully. There is no correct or incorrect, only your moral framework can decide what is right or wrong in this test.
Then post your moral parsimony score as well as the comparison of yours to scores of others (towards the bottom a bit) of others. Remember to read the whole results page, it could help you formulate an opinion in this debate.
Mine:
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your Moral Parsimony Score is 96%
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Geographical Distance:
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your score of 100% is significantly higher than the average score of 73% in this category.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]The suggestion then is that geographical distance plays little, if any, role in your moral thinking.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Family Relatedness:[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your score of 100% is a lot higher than the average score of 54% in this category.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]It looks as if issues of family relatedness play have no significant role to play in your thinking about moral issues.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Acts and Omissions:[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your score of 83% is much higher than the average score of 60% in this category.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]It seems that you do not think that the distinction between acting and omitting to act has any real moral significance.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Scale:[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your score of 100% is significantly higher than the average score of 73% in this category.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]It seems that scale, as it is described above, is not an important consideration in your moral worldview. But if, contrary to our findings, it is important, then it decreases the parsimoniousness of your moral framework.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]I'm interested in seeing other RFers scores...[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Now, what do you think about moral parsimony? Good or bad?[/SIZE][/FONT]
Personally, I think that a high level of moral parsimony is good. However, not too high, as this could decrease the flexibility when alternating variables come into play.
http://www.philosophersnet.com/games/morality_play.htm
Remember, you are to answer what is morally right, not necessarily what you would do in the situation. Read each question carefully. There is no correct or incorrect, only your moral framework can decide what is right or wrong in this test.
Then post your moral parsimony score as well as the comparison of yours to scores of others (towards the bottom a bit) of others. Remember to read the whole results page, it could help you formulate an opinion in this debate.
Mine:
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your Moral Parsimony Score is 96%
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Geographical Distance:
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your score of 100% is significantly higher than the average score of 73% in this category.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]The suggestion then is that geographical distance plays little, if any, role in your moral thinking.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Family Relatedness:[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your score of 100% is a lot higher than the average score of 54% in this category.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]It looks as if issues of family relatedness play have no significant role to play in your thinking about moral issues.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Acts and Omissions:[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your score of 83% is much higher than the average score of 60% in this category.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]It seems that you do not think that the distinction between acting and omitting to act has any real moral significance.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Scale:[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Your score of 100% is significantly higher than the average score of 73% in this category.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]It seems that scale, as it is described above, is not an important consideration in your moral worldview. But if, contrary to our findings, it is important, then it decreases the parsimoniousness of your moral framework.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]I'm interested in seeing other RFers scores...[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Now, what do you think about moral parsimony? Good or bad?[/SIZE][/FONT]
Personally, I think that a high level of moral parsimony is good. However, not too high, as this could decrease the flexibility when alternating variables come into play.