Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Peace be on you.
Ouch.No he actually existed. It makes common sense anyway.
ROTFLMAOAll of this popularity based on a person that never existed? I doubt it.
There is more written about Harry Potter than there is about Jesus.But I can believe someone existed but was exaggerated in some ways. People can be exaggerated but it doesn't mean they don't exist. Saying there's no evidence would be like saying that other historical figures never existed because you don't have a picture. There's statues and books written about them, as well as Jesus. You believe other historical figures existed even though they were around before Jesus, yet don't believe Jesus existed? Doesn't make sense to me.
Ouch.
The "common sense" as support does not help.
ROTFLMAO
Mickey Mouse
Batman
Superman
God
There is more written about Harry Potter than there is about Jesus.
So by using your above "logic" Harry Potter actually existed, right?
Peace be on you.
As far as Muslims are concerned, this is no issue.
Additionally, Ahmadiyya-Muslim book mentions, 'ointment of Jesus' :
" .....A piece of evidence of great value with regard to the escape of Jesus from the Cross, which no one can help admitting, is a medical preparation known as Marham-i-Isa or the 'Ointment of Jesus' recorded in hundreds of medical books. Some of these books were compiled by Christians, some by Magians or Jews, some by Muslims. Most of them are very old. Investigations show that in the beginning the preparation came to be known as an oral tradition among hundreds of thousands of people. Then they recorded it. At first, in the very time of Jesus, a little after the event of the Cross, a pharmaceutical work was compiled in Latin, in which there was a mention of this preparation along with the statement that the preparation had been prepared for the wounds of Jesus. Next, this work was translated into several languages, until, in the time of Mamun-al-Rashid, it was translated into Arabic. It is, moreover, a strange result of divine intervention that eminent physicians of all religions -- Christian, Jew, Magian, or Muslim -- have all mentioned this preparation in their books, and have stated that it was prepared for Jesus by the disciples. A study of books on pharmacology shows that this preparation is very useful in cases of injuries due to blows or falls, arresting immediately the flow of blood; and as it also contains 'myrrh' the wound remains aseptic.........................................
List of books containing a mention of Marham-i-Isa,
and a statement that the ointment was prepared for
Jesus, i.e., for the wounds on his body
..........
"
https://www.alislam.org/library/books/jesus-in-india/ch3.html
Marham-i-Isa = Ointment of Jesus
================================================================
Evidence from books of history
https://www.alislam.org/library/books/jesus-in-india/ch4.html
Good wishes.
Nobody worships Batman and Superman.
Note that i added the little word (anti) before Christ.Aliens would not be Christ.
Interesting.
I might add, we could give evidence to show a lot of people in history never existed either.
Well said, yet again.How are you still on this forum? Read this carefully. When I say read, I mean actually read what I wrote, not read the first two lines. Again don't be snobby or resort to schoolyard taunts or say "lolz" every post. It gets old fast.
Anyways Jesus was a preacher who I believe was exaggerated in many ways. He was worshipped later on. Nobody worships Batman and Superman. What point are you even trying to make? That's for fictional entertainment but no one is making a religion out of those characters and believe they existed. Your argument doesn't even make sense to begin with. And don't even use Jediism. They use the philosophy but don't believe Yoda or Obi Wan exist.
Ok Jesus didn't exist. Let's just accept that Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, and Pythagoras never existed either. You'll say "Oh well there's statues and art and books written about them as well as quotes taken from them." Ok...the same applies to Jesus. There are quotes, books, art and statues of him as well. You believe those historical figures existed yet not Jesus? And those guys existed before Jesus was around. Is there proof? Perhaps but we may never find it. But there is certainty evidence he existed. You want proof which is NOT the same thing as evidence. There may not be something that proves his existence, as in, shows that there is undeniable proof of his existence, but there is plenty of evidence SUPPORTING that he existed.
Well said, yet again.
I might add, we could give evidence to show a lot of people in history never existed either.
Your speculation is pre-supposing and basically confirmation bias logically speaking. Your theory merely backs your ideas that don't have any evidence.