If that's the case, try explaining it again.. (that is, if you want to).
Can you eat scrambled eggs without a fork?
Answer this question and there will be another that will hopefully help you understand what I was trying to say
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If that's the case, try explaining it again.. (that is, if you want to).
Can you eat scrambled eggs without a fork?
Answer this question and there will be another that will hopefully help you understand what I was trying to say
I am finished debating with you. Have a very nice day and week.
No sorry, different question. My question was HOW MANY HAVE GONE TO HEAVEN? Since the statement.
<Sigh>
I was trying to explain it:
You can eat the eggs without a fork but you can't eat scrambled eggs WITHOUT THE EGG.
The egg is the sacrifice.
So no matter how much praying one does(the fork), without the sacrifice (or egg - that you said you believe in, which I wasn't questioning) all the praying in the world would be for not.
You need the sacrifice
That's where I was going. I wasn't questioning rather or not it's valid or you do or don't or should or shouldn't believe in it.
That's a different topic altogether.
If I got what you were saying wrong, I apologize. Suffice it to say that I believe that we need the sacrifice and you don't believe that we would need it if there wasn't any reason. I really don't understand what you are saying, however, if that isn't it. The egg example didn't make sense to me at all. I mean you wouldn't have scrambled eggs without any eggs, but then nothing is scrambled at all and if there is nothing then nothing would be said and we wouldn't discuss nothing (Or maybe we would, I have discussed nothing pretty well in my time, ha-ha).
The sacrifice is implied by scriptures. If one doesn't believe in the scriptures then he or she isn't going to believe in the sacrifice for any reason. As I keep saying, I wouldn't expect anyone who doesn't believe in scriptures to accept anything that they say- no matter what religion the scriptures come from (A lot of different religions have different scriptures, and I see a resemblance in them, although they are not totally alike).
is this logical and acceptable....?
... god's messenger ...
Ignoring who believes what for a minute, would you agree or disagree that no matter how much a person prays to the christian god, they can't be saved without the christian god's sacrifice having happened?
Jesus died to save the lambs.
Jesus died to save the lambs.
I didn't really mean to say that. David didn't have a sacrifice when he was forgiven of adultery. He said to the prophet, Nathan "I have sinned against God" and Nathan said "The Lord forgives you". But the child that resulted died. I think maybe the penalty was lowered.
Edit: I meant lowered for us
i would say the child was the sacrifice.
People were saved even before Christ died, if you read the OT.
Brings up a good point: How? And why was a sacrifice needed in the NT and not the OT? Why not have the sacrifice earlier?
I can't really answer that.
I don't know about that. Since I believe that God takes children and babies "home" when they die, then I don't see it that way. I guess I can understand why you do.
tell that to all those animals that were bbq all for the purpose of filling gods nostrils with a sweet-smelling fragrance :sarcasticEdit: And a sacrifice would be a willing one.
Which brings up yet another interesting question:
if the christian god is real, why not relate the answer to such a question to all its believers?
Why are some "gifted" with knowledge while others aren't?
Seems like the same god would want his followers to know the same principles and fundamentals, no?
Or why not?
maybe some are just gifted with the talent of pulling BS out of their arses
while others are honest about what they know