Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You must spread some Karma around before giving it to gracie again.:banghead3gracie said:ah, but enlightenment means many differnt things to different people! to some it means letting go of the ego and the extinction of desire. to others it means a surrender of one's will for the will of God. and to others it means becoming intuned with the rhythms of the greater universe and letting go of the illusion of distinctions.
either way, it's a tough road to travel. i do think enlightenment is possible. some individuals may be better spiritually prepared to seek enlightenment than others, but ultimately it's about the individual's efforts and attention to mindfulness along the way. whether you're "offically enlightened" of not, you can still live with love and sensitivity.
Michel-michel said:Is Mindfulness a tennet of the Quaker belief?
here and there... i try to study all the major religions a little, just to have some idea of where folks are coming from!Engyo said:Gracie -have you studied Buddhism at all?
Well, you seem to have 'soaked up' some good stuff.gracie said:here and there... i try to study all the major religions a little, just to have some idea of where folks are coming from!
Enlightenment, to me, is when one realizes that samsara is actually nirvana. Enlightenment is when one realizes that one's enemy is actually one's friend; that what is "imperfect" or "damaged" is actually wonderful and just the way that it's supposed to be; that this earth, which can seem like hell at times is actually heaven.Sunstone said:What is enlightenment? Does it exist? Is it possible?
hmmm... so what you're saying is that enlightenment is recognizing "the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part."robtex said:Sometimes it is putting little pieces together that didn't seem tangent at first but have an intimate relationship. Many times in college I would be looking at a sociology book and remember some obscure demographics from another course and how it related to my current reading or be looking at cash flow statements in the school of business and remember a marketing concept from a marketing class that might get a better return on an overused (and hypothical in college) expendure on start-up costs.....
For metaphysics and intangables like morality sometimes it is thinking about how a countries political system factors into it or a personally witnessed or personally felt experience in my past.
It is that context that is added from a past revelation or learning experience that can be superinposed in thought to get a different angle on an idea. Nothing in our lifetime happens in a vaccum unless we purposely shut out our past experience and understanding of the world we live in.
no...more like drawing on past learned experiences and deductions and applying it to current situations even when not presented as such in a pre-packaged set. Not on the basis of osmosis or metathought but more of past knowledge gained or deduced as applied to tangent or relevant current ideas or thoughts.lilithu said:hmmm... so what you're saying is that enlightenment is recognizing "the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part."
I wasn't talking about osmosis or metathought. I was talking about seeing connections between things - between past and present, between one situation and another - that one didn't see before.robtex said:no...more like drawing on past learned experiences and deductions and applying it to current situations even when not presented as such in a pre-packaged set. Not on the basis of osmosis or metathought but more of past knowledge gained or deduced as applied to tangent or relevant current ideas or thoughts.
Hi lilithu, Namaste,lilithu said:hmmm... so what you're saying is that enlightenment is recognizing "the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part."
Namaste Michel,michel said:Hi lilithu, Namaste,
That sounds O.K to me - what's wrong with Rob's comment ?
I like the general statement; however I feel that "recognizing" is far too weak a term. "Fully embracing and comprehending deeply" is probably also too weak, but it's what I can think of at the moment.......lilithu said:hmmm... so what you're saying is that enlightenment is recognizing "the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part."
Greetings:Sunstone said:What is enlightenment? Does it exist? Is it possible?