Wrong again.
Matthew 5:18 Commentaries: "For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.
So, you are still bound by those 600+ laws. Including not eating bacon double cheeseburgers, peel 'n eat shrimp, or wearing poly/cotton blends (which really
are an abomination - always take style and fashion advice from a gay man).
Sorry but your really in over your head with the Bible. Actually I am not going to complain, this is the first time you have posted anything that it took longer to find a fault with than it took to read. The law referred to in Mathew is most often sited in commentaries as the prophetic law.
At your own link: Shall in no wise pass from, the law — Or, from the prophets, till all be fulfilled — Till all things which the law requires, or
the prophets foretel, shall be effected. This seems to be the literal translation of the original words, εως αν παντα γενηται
But let's pretend what I quoted is wrong. Let's instead assume that Jesus was saying the Levitical laws shall not pass away until all that the prophets predicted comes to pass. Then what do you do with the rest of the Bible. An example being:
English Standard Version
By canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross.
Now I know which laws were nailed to the cross and which weren't, do you? It seems your doing the same thing with the bible that you do with my posts. You are ignoring 99.9% of it and misrepresenting the .01% that is left.
However let's assume neither one of those conclusions were correct and by some miracle you correctly understood the scripture you quoted. It would not matter, even if the Levitical laws are still in effect. By this I mean they are still true, we are no longer judged by them. It may still be wrong to eat food dedicated to false God's but Christians are no longer judged by that law, we are judged by grace. The OT is called the covenant of the law for a reason, the NT is called the covenant of grace for a reason. The covenant of the law (because God found fault with it) has been replaced by a better (his words) covenant called grace (which is perfect and will stand until judgment. If you had enough biblical knowledge to keep up I could show you why that was necessary, and how vast the scriptures are that demonstrate this.
BTW other issues that point to this are many of the laws given to the Hebrews had to do with chronological things. For instance the prohibition against eating certain foods was given because certain parasites would survive the primitive cooking they used back then, some dealt with simple sanitary limitations that no longer exist, and many of them were to take place at the Temple which no longer exists. Others had to do with how the priestly class was to act and the ceremonies they were to facilitate, but Jesus himself condemned and abolished the entire Hebrew priestly class and it's institutions, because he replaced them all as the only high priest that would ever exist when he rose from the dead, and others had to do with animal sacrifice which he also abolished and replaced.
It is obvious that you were better suited to debate homosexuality than the bible, so if you failed to adequately defend what you were more qualified for, why are you now attacking that which you are woefully unprepared to discuss?
Start by looking up a concept called OT types and shadows which pointed to NT realities.