I do not agree. And I am speaking as an individual who believes in the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth.
Denying evolution which has mountains of empirical evidence which can be seen, measured and tested is not the same thing as denying the existence of a single individual who live 2000 years ago.
I find the evidence for the existence of Jesus satisfactory, but it is not overwhelming, certainly not anything on par with the theory of evolution.
I find it frustrating when people arguing for the existence of Jesus make ridiculously over-exaggerated claims. Like "there is more evidence for Jesus than there is for Julius Caesar", or "we have archeological evidence that proves everything in the New Testament is true", or even "denying Jesus is just like denying evolution". I wish people could see that making these kind of irrational over-exaggerated claims actually makes your argument weaker, not stronger.
In the last little while on this board I can think of two posters arguing against the historicity of Jesus who I have had reasonable exchanges with, and I can think of two who were absolutely irrational idiots. This is a much better percentage than I have had with people who deny evolution. I don't think any of the people on this board who deny evolution are even remotely rational, and some of the are completely insane. Although I think those who deny the historicity of Jesus are wrong, skepticism in this area is not insane.