Fair enough, your evidence surpasses mine.
But let me ask you this; do you consider CNN to be psuedo-news? IOW, CNN picks and chooses their stories carefully in such a way that it persuades it's audience to see things the way the directors of the station want it to be seen?
...Kind of like how psuedo-science is.
I do not like CNN for their strong editorial stance. I believe what you are referring as Psuedo-news is the editorial position of the News source.
I listed my preferred sources that pass muster, and BBC and the New York Times tops the list with NPR taking third place. There are other specialized sources like Forbes, which are on my list.